Previously in Readers Write...
Readers Write #1 March 09
News from the author, now and then.One of the rewards of self-publishing is the number of messages I get from people who read my books. Here are some of their comments. First names only, for obvious reasons.
Readers Write #2 May 09
Listen, I just write the books. Who knows where they end up? I've
had mail from Norwegians on oil platforms, and from a pilot who
flies jumbos for a South Pacific airline, and from Jim in Alberta
where it's often 30 or 40 below. I'm told the U.S. Marines in
Iraq enjoy my WW2 desert story, A Good Clean Fight.
Nothing surprises me, not even the email from Tim in Australia that
began: "The first book I stole was
Piece of Cake." He
nicked it from the school library when he was 16. "I probably
read it another six or seven times before it fell apart." By then
he was old enough to pay for books, so he bought another copy.
Should have bought two, and given the other to the library.
These thoughts are prompted by the steady stream of letters (and
cheques or PayPal requests) that followed
Lezard's corker of a review of
Hullo Russia, Goodbye England
in The Guardian a couple of weeks ago. David in Maryland ordered a copy
and wrote that he came across Goshawk
Squadron over 35 years ago and still re-reads it, along with other
yarns of mine. Helen in Dublin said she 'enjoyed' my writing,
then thought that 'appreciated' was a better word, and finally upgraded
that to 'enthralled'. W.B.T. in Southampton has read and re-read all my
books, and (he says) so has his wife, which is pleasing.
Paul in Dublin ranks me as "one of 3 or 4 authors all of whose work I
own"; and Matt in London "recently read
Goshawk Squadron on my
honeymoon and absolutely loved it." (Let's hope that marks the
start of a long relationship.) And many more
letters, saying more of the same, including the nice lady in
Wales who addressed me as 'Dear Sir or Madam'.
Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #3 June 09
is a very good researcher, By chance, he met the owner of a Californian
leather-goods shop who was one of the Polish Jews rescued from the
German death camps by Oskar Schindler. After that, Keneally worked hard
to find the facts that became
Schindler's Ark, which became the film Schindler's List. He
could have written another Holocaust history. Instead, he wrote his
book as fiction - not because he wasn't sure of the truth, but because
he didn't want it to end up on the packed shelves of Holocaust volumes.
Keneally wanted his story to be read by people who never look at World
War Two histories. And he succeeded.
I think I know how he feels. I parted company with one publisher because my fiction always ended up in the Military History section of the shop. That wasn't why I wrote it. I wrote it for the Keneally reason, so that people might get an idea of what war is like at the sharp end. Not the daily scores in, say, air combat in the desert war (which is how military historians tend to see the battle) but how a fighter squadron lives, kills and dies in the sand, flies and blood of the Western Desert. A Good Clean Fight is good history; I researched it thoroughly. But it takes you where the military histories never go. I hope that's true of all my flying stuff.
Including the latest, Hullo Russia, Goodbye England. I've had some feedback from former Vulcan pilots and groundcrew. Chris in London flew Vulcans and said: "It was a good read, and took me back." Brad in Lincoln said, "Have just finished it. Grand read!" Having been front-line ground crew for 15 years, he noticed a couple of places where I slightly bent the truth - for instance, each Vulcan airbase was either a Blue Steel or a bomb station, but not both. My mistake.
And here's another detail I might have included: "There is no mention of the dreaded P Tube, a rubber bladder with a fitted chrome receptacle into which you could pee, if you really had to. After a sortie, each crew member emptied their own, normally at the side of the Crew Chief's hut on the pan." I suspect that's the kind of info my readers like to know. Some people thought Baggy Bletchley bought it in a portable loo at the end of Piece of Cake, and were pleasantly surprised to meet him again in Hullo Russia. He survived Cake, and A Good Clean Fight; he may surface again.
I was happy that Brad confirmed the problems of arming a Vulcan with the Blue Steel missile. The fuel (HTP) was so toxic that any groundcrew splashed with it had to dive into a nearby plunge bath instantly, or his clothing caught fire. And loading the missile meant 230 gold studs (the Butt Connector) made perfect contact; if not, download and start again. An exercise involving Blue Steel began hours before take-off. A far cry from the famous 'four-minute warning' of an attack.
Peter, a former Vulcan captain now in France, got the book and wrote: "I sat in a deckchair at the week-end and I pretty much read it straight through. I think that says a great deal, and I found it a good read. The story perhaps stretched the imagination a little in some areas. Certainly our hero Silk could not have been disposed of quite so quickly." Well, endings are often the most difficult part. Peter adds that he joined the Vulcan OCU eight years after Silk. By then, the aircraft was a truly low-level machine, Blue Steel had long gone, and so had the WW2 veterans in the aircrew. (Maybe some of the mindset of those who had bombed German cities went with them.) But Peter also read Piece of Cake. "I think you have caught the repartee and banter of aircrew magnificently," he says. "My first Vulcan squadron used the Snow White party trick." (That's the one with everyone in line astern, marching on their knees, arms folded, singing 'Hey Ho!' - it's in Cake, page 75.) "With 55 aircrew on the squadron, there were sometimes more than seven dwarfs!"
Thanks to all who wrote. And welcome to several public libraries who have bought copies, including Enfield (in London), Hartlepool, North Yorkshire, Dorset and Wrexham. Glad to have you on board.
Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
No Guinness in Mongolia,
a shrink's view of Silko,
and "Jag tycker om det," in spades.
Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
how many people steal books, especially books by me. I've heard from
upright citizens who wouldn't think of cheating on the golf course, but
admit that they stole a copy of 'Piece of Cake' or 'Damned Good
Show'. Often it was the school or college library
that was plundered. That's how Jan in
authors? Before I wrote 'Goshawk
Squadron', for instance, I worked hard on the research, and learned all
about what the R.F.C. was doing in
Now for something brighter, as they don't say on TV
news. Imagination. I
use it all the time. How it works, beats
me. I'm just grateful.
Take a story of mine called 'Kentucky Blues'. It's about a small,
not-too-bright town called
partly from my imagination and largely from my experience when I was
for the Manhattan Rugby Club in
round-up of some readers' messages. Ron in Walthomstow
Many thanks to everyone.
Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #6 October 09
Tin Pan Alley,
and a First from
Someone remarked that there are no heroes in my books. Plenty of courage, no lack of sacrifice, a lot of death. But heroes? The word itself has been done to death. I was in New York when US soldiers, marines and airmen returned from the First Gulf War, nearly twenty years ago, and they got a tickertape reception. New Yorkers called them all 'heroes', and many servicemen looked uncomfortable with the label. In any army, for every frontline fighting man there are six or seven or even ten men behind him, providing support. Cooks, medics, dentists, truck drivers, guys organising supplies, keeping records, sending signals. All doing essential jobs, but are they all heroes? When everyone is heroic, the word has lost all meaning. Let's save it for those who truly deserve it.
Moving on: I've always believed
that a good writer can
write convincingly in any style that's needed
- tabloid journalism, song lyrics,
boring bureaucratic jargon,
whatever. I'm sometimes disappointed by
crime novelists who include chunks of newspaper
reporting for the sake of plot.
They've obviously never worked on a paper. When I wrote 'The
about a double agent reporting allegedly secret info -
his style often had to be boring in order to be convincing. The facts seemed more exciting because the
writing was so dull. I worked hard on
that, just as I did in 'A Good Clean
Fight' where I wanted to quote the lyrics of a certain popular song. (Good contrast with the bleak
When you don't care...
I'm bound in iron bands.
When you don't care...
I'm lost in desert sands.
In this wilderness, with none but you to guide me,
I'm in heaven with your tenderness beside me...
And if you think any fool could have written that, just try writing the next verse. But don't steal my words. They're my copyright now.
Fresh insights from
readers' messages. Anthony in London
bought 'Hullo Russia...' and mentions what a pleasure it is "to find a
novelist who is able to produce books that you can't put down - I
finished 'Piece of Cake' in a few days and felt totally wrung out
by the sense
of tension and fatigue you managed to sustain..." By
contrast, a different reaction from John,
And Richard in
My thanks to you all.
Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #7 November 09
Viewers are smart,
readers are far-flung,
The television adaptation of Piece of Cake still attracts questions. (It was first shown in 1988, so if you're under 25, ask your parents.) All five hour-long episodes are now available on DVD, at what strikes me (and I can be impartial because I sold the rights and so I don't make a penny from the DVD) as a very low price. If you can't find it locally, try Ian Allan Publishing - that's where I bought mine. For a drama, the TV showing pulled in a big audience. I think the final episode attracted 13 million viewers in the UK, and LWT sold the series around the world. In the US it went out on Mobil Masterpiece Theatre, a much respected viewing slot. And don't tell me they spell it 'Theater' over there. Mobil called it 'Theatre', and I have the poster to prove it.
Tim in Victoria, Australia was 12 at the time, watched Cake with his Mum, bet her that Moggy would survive, "which of course ultimately resulted in my having to make both our beds for a week." This throws an interesting light on the novel and one reason why I think it keeps on getting re-read (and re-shown): it's the unpredictable nature of events. A good story should surprise. I set out to tell the events of the Phoney War, the Battle for France and the Battle of Britain, just as they might have happened to one RAF fighter squadron. All the research I did (and that was a lot) confirmed one thing: many pilots got killed, some in battle, some not, some by inexperience, some by sheer bad luck. Flying was risky in those days. On a typical fighter squadron, of those pilots who had begun the war, most would not be flying a year later. Sometimes none.
This is the unpredictable element that keeps Piece of Cake on edge. When the television series was being cast, I was pleased to see that I recognised hardly any names. Viewers are smart. They know that the star they meet in episode one is not going to be killed in episode two or three, and probably not at all - television has paid that actor a ton of money and it's not going to be wasted. Nearly all the pilots in Piece of Cake were played by young unknown actors. Some became better known later (Jeremy Northam, Nathaniel Parker) and Tom Burlinson had already made a name in Australia but not in Britain. So viewers could never guess who would live and who would die. Tim, aged 12, guessed wrongly, and that both reflected the truth of the war and upheld the dramatic tension of the story. Incidentally, I thought Neil Dudgeon, who played Moggy Cattermole, was excellent. An RAF fighter pilot who actually led a squadron in the Battle of Britain read the book, saw the series, and wrote to me. He had known men like Moggy, and he summed him up very neatly: "Bad for discipline, good for morale - every squadron should have one. Just one."
Other questions I get asked: (1) Did I write the screenplay? No, I didn't. I'd put four hard years into the novel, and I was very happy when Leon Griffiths (who created Minder) wrote the screenplay. (2) The novel says Hurricanes, so why use Spitfires? Very few Hurricanes survived, and none were aerobatic, so it was Spits or nothing. (3) Did I like the TV version? Well, naturally I pefer the book, but it's a long story and if they'd shot the whole of the printed word, the series would never have ended. It's pretty good. The music is haunting. I wish it were on CD.
Back to readers write. Among the more exotic messages have been those from Bernice, who runs Crooked Timber Books in what sounds like a very rugged corner of Nova Scotia; Jarmo in Finland (ordering the RFC trilogy); Anette in Sweden (ditto); plus Karen in Switzerland (Hornet's Sting), Jules in Holland, Charles in Prague and Werner in Vienna (all for Hullo Russia, Goodbye England).
Which prompts two thoughts. First: that I'm lucky to write in English, a global language. When an Egyptian airliner talks to Bulgarian air traffic control, they talk in English. I'm sure Finland is a delightful country, but if I'd been born there, writing in Finnish would not have made my career any easier. And my second thought is that there are translations of my work sitting on my shelves that might make an unusual gift if you have a friend in another country. I have copies of Goshawk Squadron in French (Les Abattoirs du Ciel), in Spanish (Escadrilla Azur), and in Dutch (Het Havik Squadron). There's The Eldorado Network in Spanish (El Spia Dorado) and in Dutch (Het Eldorado Netwerk); and Kramer's War in Finnish (Luutnantti Kramerin Sota) and in what may be Belgian but is probably Dutch (Kramer's Oorlog). I've even got Polish versions of A Good Clean Fight (Pustynny Ogien), and of The Eldorado Network (Siatka Eldorado) and of Artillery of Lies (Artyleria Klamstw). If you're interested, email me and we'll take it from there.
My thanks to all who have written.
Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #8 December 09
Rumblings in Cornwall,
the Forgotten War,
and three helpings of 'Cake'
I sense a smouldering impatience in Cornwall. K.M.D. of St Ives writes to say how much he's enjoyed my previous books, especially the RFC/RAF trilogies. 'Damned Good Show' meant much to him because his father-in-law was in Bomber Command in WW2, got shot down in a Wellington, spent four years in Stalag Luft III, and then in the 1950s instructed at RAF Finningley, a V-Bomber base. Which is why K.M.D. particularly wanted to read 'Hullo Russia, Goodbye England' - it echoes much of his father-in-law's experience.
But then he adds: "I've been disappointed that there aren't more of your RAF books. After all, there's still a lot of WW2 left for Hornet Squadron after 'A Good Clean Fight', and there's also Korea, Suez etc."
Well, I wish I could oblige. The money would be nice. I see other writers who, year after year, produce a succession of novels that play variations on the same tune, and a small voice inside me says: Why don't you do that? Dick Francis writes a horse-racing novel a year. His fans love him. Write an RAF novel a year and your fans will love you. Why not? And a loud voice inside me says: Because you'll be bored rigid. Even the great Conan Doyle grew to loath Sherlock Holmes and tried to kill him off. His fans wouldn't wear it and Doyle went back to grinding out more variations on a tune that must have made him want to throttle someone. If not Holmes, then Watson. Or Inspector Lestrade. Or Mrs Hudson.. Or, ideally, the whole gang.
I'm not in the grinding-out business. I write novels because I find an idea that strikes me as different, even surprising. I try to write a story that I enjoy - something fresh and unusual, maybe something that upsets what most people think they already know. Every novel is a gamble. I like risk. So I can't do what K.M.D. of St Ives suggests, which is to put Hornet Squadron into Suez or Korea simply because those wars happened. I need an idea as well, a hook to hang the story on.
One of the hooks I found, and used in 'Damned Good Show', is the forgotten war waged by Bomber Command from the outbreak of war to 1941/2. Say 'Bomber Command' to most people and they think of Lancasters flattening German cities. But the Lancs weren't much seen on ops until mid-1942, and not in large numbers until 1943. Take the Thousand-Bomber Raid on Cologne on 30th May 1942; only 73 Lancs took part in that, as compared with 79 Hampdens, 131 Halifaxes and 602 Wellingtons (plus others). In fact, Bomber Command's first operation was on the very day that war was declared, 3rd September 1939. During the next couple of years, the Command learned how (and how not) to take the battle to the enemy homeland.
So I was very pleased to hear from someone who was there at the start. Lawrence Wheatley in Bude, Cornwall. He qualified as an Air Observer (soon to be renamed Navigator) in summer 1939, and joined 'B' Flight of 144 Squadron. The squadron flew Hampdens, a compact twin-engine bomber that plays a big part in 'Damned Good Show'. Lawrence suffered from chronic air-sickness and was grounded by the medics, which almost certainly saved his life, because on 29 September 1939 'B' Flight was searching for targets north of Heligoland and ran into German fighters. All five Hampdens were shot down. Soon people were calling it the 'Phoney War'. It was real enough for the RAF. Throughout WW2, Bomber Command losses were heavy. Of the 48 men who completed Lawrence's Air Observer course, 28 died in action or in flying accidents.
Lawrence said he's enjoying D.G.S., "though slightly disappointed" that it's centred on the officers "and little is said about the Sergeants' Mess where the majority of the crew would live." It's a fair point. My problem was numbers. I told the story through the pilots, who were usually officers. That involved a dozen (or more) characters. If I had included the Sergeants' Mess too, it would have doubled the cast. That would be more than I, or most readers, could handle.
Meanwhile, my other flying stories have been prompting some mail. Bob in Ottery St. Mary flew Canberras and Buccaneers (both types were capable of carrying nuclear weapons) and he writes: "I don't know how you do it, but the atmosphere and the characters on the squadrons I've served on are often reflected in your books." Steve in Nottingham, having just read 'Hullo Russia, Goodbye England', says: "The flying descriptions - absolutely brilliant. I presume you leaned on some former pilots to get that right." Well, I certainly had my stuff doublechecked for accuracy, but in essence it all came out of what's left of my mind. Chris in the Borders "liked HRGE immensely. You have a way with character dialogue that, in my opinion, is second to none....Also the story had me from the start; these are characters that I may not necessarily care about, but I revel in their ups and downs, and ultimately they mostly win me over by the end; including Luis Cabrillo from 'The Eldorado Network' trilogy..." (It's actually a quartet, with the new book 'Operation Bamboozle', which Chris bought.) Jonathan in Basingstoke is now on his third copy of 'Piece of Cake', having worn out the other two: "Still an old favourite that I revisit every few years....and it has the rare gift of giving something different every time." While Susan of Colchester bought HRGE and 'Hornet's Sting' as a Christmas gift for her husband, "a devotee of your writing"; and when Richard in Kent got his copy of 'Operation Bamboozle', he was "really chuffed to have a shelf full of your produce." And I'm chuffed too.Thanks to everyone who wrote.
Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #9 February 2010
Barrel-rolling a Boeing, our forgetful MPs, and a nice line in scams.
For the filming of Piece of Cake, the Spitfires were flown by professionals, and they took it seriously, which is understandable when (a) the aeroplane was worth half a million pounds (more now), and (b) it was irreplaceable, and (c) your life depended on it.
Nevertheless, I remember a day when the weather was too gloomy for filming, and one pilot got very bored with hanging around. When the cloud-level lifted the light was still poor, but he was itching to fly, and so he took off and threw his Spit around for ten minutes. Just for fun. No charge on the producers. But the pilot got a big charge out of it.
I mention this because I imagine that inside every commercial pilot is the ghost of a fighter pilot who sometimes looks at his Airbus or his Boeing and wonders what it would be be like to perform a sweet barrel roll, or play leapfrog with the clouds. Just for fun. Then the fighter pilot gets firmly put back in his box and the pro pilot returns to another day in the cockpit. Or, as many call it, the office.
Maybe that explains why quite a few working pilots like to read my stuff. Rowland in New South Wales spent eight years flying in police helicopters, and he read his paperback Piece of Cake so often that it fell apart. He says: "Many of my vintage aircrew read it in our many and lengthy downtimes. We read parts of it to each other across the crewroom, office and hangar floor...Good memories." (He's now bought a hardback copy from me.) "A sincere thank you for the many hours of enjoyment Piece of Cake brought to very bored aircrew waiting for the telephone to ring." Robert in Cologne is another pilot (he's with Lufthansa) who keeps returning to Cake (now on his sixth reading). "For me, it is maybe the best book about flying fighters I have ever read," he writes, "apart from being a very good book." And he adds something it's always good to hear from a pro pilot: "You got the flying scenes right - and I'm very sensitive when it comes to that." But it's the humour and the characters that keep drawing him back: "I just read the part where Squadron Leader Rex elaborates on fighter tactics in October '39 - with Reilly (his dog) yawning and wandering away. That is so good." Dogs often make useful contributions in my books. My wife reckons that Othello, the elderly basset hound in Operation Bamboozle, has the best lines. Nobody hears him, of course, but he knows what he thinks.
Moving on: Gordon in Suffolk worked for Rolls-Royce engines until recently. He enjoyed Hullo Russia, Goodbye England, and he's not the first to tell me he's "absolutely appalled that you could not find a publisher. If you can't get this type of book published, who can?" It's a mystery to me too, but commercial publishers go their own sweet way, which is why I self-publish my stuff. Gordon, having found my website, says: "It was like discovering a treasure trove of undiscovered goodies." (He meant the books, not my author's photograph, which a friend said looks like a benevolent Balkans dictator. That's what friends are for.) Gordon passes on a story he was told by a veteran aerospace journalist who went to a reception given by a defence manufacturer. Many youngish MPs were there. The journo remarked to them that it was marvellous to see the Vulcan, greatest of all V-bombers, flying again. Blank looks. 'V-bombers....Vulcan, Victor, Valiant...Cold War... nuclear deterrent in the 1960s...' More blank looks. Gordon quotes Alan Bennett: "There is nowhere more distant than the recent past." Too true. It's one reason why I wrote HRGE. People forget. Even things like the motto of the nuclear powers - Mutual Assured Destruction - can slip their mind.
Readers continue to intrigue me by their sheer stamina. David in Barnes SW13 reckons he's read "just about every one of your books at least 5 times (beginning with Goshawk Squadron) and I have now recruited my present wife, my ex-wife, my two brothers, my daughter, her husband and soon, I hope, their two boys." To which, with the Cake DVD, he's just hooked his son-in-law. Truly amazing. John, somewhere in Oz, is reading Damned Good Show for the fourth time, and - because his dad flew in them - would like me to write about the dangerous, low-level work of four-engine Halifaxes dropping supplies to partisans in Italy, Jugoslavia, even Poland. Very hairy ops. And Peter in Ontario got a kick out of reading A Good Clean Fight, since his dad flew Kittyhawks with the Desert Air Force, went on to fly Spits in Johnson's Canadian wing at D-Day, and survived the war. Peter ("I'm a big fan") bought Hornet's Sting, Op Bam and Hullo Russia. Then Karen in Switzerland, having just read War Story and Hornet's Sting, says: "I loved both and 'missed' reading them when finished." She's always been interested in vintage aeroplanes and in photography (she sent me some fine airborne** shots taken at Old Warden, especially one of the Bristol Fighter), and her partner is a retired pilot. Add her interest in the history of both World Wars and (she says) "You managed to tick all the boxes that make the perfect book for me. I adored all the characters and found myself completely absorbed by the pilot psyche of the day." Lastly, Stephen in Nottingham "enjoyed Bamboozle, which managed to combine a page-turning plot with some lovely period detail (as ever), and a nice line in scams." He then raises an unusual point. In Cake, he says, I supply the background to every main character - except Moggy Cattermole. Stephen wants to know more about him. I'll give it some serious thought.
Thanks to everyone who wrote.Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
** If you would like to see Karen's pictures, Click Here
Readers Write #10 March 2010
Humour can be more dangerous than gunpowder. With gunpowder, you get a choice of two: either it explodes or it fails. With humour, the choice may be three. Ideally, people laugh. But some people may not see the point. When that happens, the silence is deafening. And yet others may find the alleged humour so unfunny that, for them, it backfires. It offends them. This is the risk you take, because there is no such thing as a joke that cannot upset somebody, somewhere. So humour is a gamble. Ask any stand-up comic. He'll tell you of nights when he had to fight the audience to make them laugh. Other nights, they would laugh no matter what he said, even if it was "Corrugated iron". Humour is a battlefield.
Maybe that's why it's such a big ingredient in
my books. I write about battlefields (some of them in the sky) and
cropping up, even in the most desperate situations. It might be gallows
humour. In my first novel, Goshawk Squadron, a very
fighter pilot is so twitchy about going on patrol that he can't face
porridge at breakfast. Woolley, the CO, comes in. "Are you going
Briers ('The Good Life') is one
of the best comic actors in
"My fave is A Good Clean Fight," he writes. "Such vivid imagery!" He's a Flight Lieutenant, RAAF, an Air Traffic Controller and amateur pilot, and his Aussie grandfather fought tank battles in the Desert War (where AGCF takes place), so it's no surprise that the book rang bells for him. But what strikes him especially is the humour. "Your wicked satire style is contagious, and I must control myself when dealing with difficult people for weeks after reading one of your books, lest I drop slightly too barbed comments in response to their 'unhelpfulness'."
month I promised Stephen in
Thanks to everyone who wrote.Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #11 May 2010
and the shock of Woolley's Twin Brother
When he was being interviewed on television, Stephen Sondheim remarked that, at the opening of West Side Story on Broadway, many of the audience walked out. The show wasn't what they expected. Their idea of a good musical was lots of easy laughs, gorgeous girls, and songs you could whistle on the way home. West Side Story, by contrast, was about love and hate between street gangs, and it changed for ever the way musicals were written. Sondheim (lyrics) and Leonard Bernstein (music) - with some help from Shakespeare - wanted to stretch their talents and challenge the audience's expectations. They wanted to move on, to create something fresh and new and surprising.
is satisfying but dangerous. Bizet's Carmen was fresh and new and
panned by the critics. When Stravinsky's Rite of Spring was first
knowledge only goes to boost my respect for those big-hearted
readers who strongly recommend my stuff to their children, wives,
working colleagues, neighbours, librarians, and someone they met in a
Some of the
emails I get rank me so highly amongst the Great Writers of
the World that I haven't the nerve to repeat them here. But Alan of W5
says, "Big fan - keep doing it!" while D.E.W. in
The obit ran in The Guardian on 22 March 1995 and it was written by Christopher MacLehose (by far the best editor I ever had). It was for Edmund Fisher, a brilliant figure in the publishing world, described as "fabulously intolerant of dead wood" and "militantly unpompous" and "a severe trial to his corporate masters". MacLehose also detected "an inadvertent likeness in him to Major Woolley, the RFC commander in Goshawk Squadron by Derek Robinson whom Edmund later published (and what a terrifying airman he would have made): a brave, passionate, rebarbative officer, always seeking out the best in his men, a tireless inspiration to them, always minding about winning, having a huge appetite for combat, insufferable to his superiors, a rattler of cages, a hater of pretentiousness and snobbery, cutter of swathes, not going to be forgotten."
Certainly not by me. Although he published Goshawk Squadron when he was at Sphere, I never met Edmund. My loss.
Readers Write #12 June 2010
Shot down by Rex,
Lambs into Tigers
Some actors say they get inside the skin of the characters they're playing by first mastering the way that character walks. I knew an actor like that, normally a charming chap but he couldn't get out of character during the run of the play; and sometimes that was rough on the family, especially when he was cast as a crude and selfish oaf. Every morning he would lurch downstairs, slump into a chair, curse the cat and demand a mug of tea in a voice made of gravel. Not easy to live with.
Actors live the part. When the TV series of Piece of Cake was being filmed on location, Tim Woodward - a pacifist in his younger years - played Rex, the squadron CO, a hard, ambitious and arrogant man. During a break in the filming I unexpectedly met Rex, in uniform, still looking hard, ambitious and arrogant. For a second, my right arm wanted to salute him. (I'd done my National Service, and you can take the boy out of the RAF but you can never take the RAF out of the boy.) Woodward, as Rex, looked right through me. Quite right. He was a squadron leader. I was an erk.
With authors, it's often names that help to create the character.
perfect for the CO (we never know his first name). Before I could
Squadron I thought a lot about that CO's name, and until I
then there's Moggy Cattermole. I named him because he's lanky,
helps if tall characters have long names. I knew someone at
Cattermole, always nicknamed Moggy, and the combination seemed right
someone who is - as a
Which leads me to the Luis Cabrillo books, not so much lamb-into-tiger
saga of Tell 'Em What They Want To Hear. It began with The Eldorado
inspired by the feats of a real double agent in WW2, codenamed Garbo.
Enter a man who sees the true worth of Luis. Graham Thorne, of
"I loved the classic Robinson opening paragraph, which brought me straight into the plot and made me want to know immediately what was going on. I also loved the headlong twists and turns of the plot and the fact that, for ages, I could not figure out what on earth the map on the cover had to do with the book I was reading.
The rapid-fire and amoral style in which the book is written seems to me to capture perfectly what it would be like to know, and live with, Luis Cabrillo. He has immense charm and wit but also that whiff of danger - and borderline lunacy - that makes us ordinary readers secretly glad to know him from a distance.
It was a joy to meet the gorgeous Stevie Fantoni again and a privilege to be introduced to the Princess Chuckling Stream. Among the superb supporting cast of hoods and enforcers, I particularly liked the psychotic Vito DiLazzari. He is the classic, indulged son of the tyrant, over-educated, so that he knows too much for his hereditary role - Fox instead of Hedgehog.
So where now for Conroy and Cabrillo? I hope we hear more of them. For, as Luis gets older and that little bit slower, and as the world gets more conformist with less room for the maverick, then life for Luis will get steadily tougher. Like a late Western, there is a great book to be written about a man running out of room, and Derek Robinson is the man to do it."
Well, time will tell. Are con artists an endangered
an unemployed lorry-driver conned a property developer out of £1
persuading him that the Savoy Hotel in
So: thanks to Graham, and to far-flung readers who recently asked for books - Anders in Sweden, David in Malaysia, Matt in Wisconsin, Fred in Virginia, Christopher in Spain, Lars in Denmark, Blair in Minneapolis, and many more.My thanks to all who wrote. Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #14 September 2010
Readers Write #15 October 2010
Snoopy dies again,
A quartet of Hurricanes,
And never enough Cake.
My thanks to all who wrote. Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #16 December 2010
Caesar's slave rides again,
Exploring the Canadian military,
and a double whammy from the US.Hanging on the wall of my bathroom is a message I got in the mail when the series based on Piece of Cake was on television. I got quite a bit of hate mail then, but this one was a classic, being not only anonymous but also written in crayon and all in capitals. It said:
HAVE YOU EVER CONSIDERED TAKING UP MORE SUITABLE EMPLOYMENT?
LIKE BEING A BROTHEL DOORMAN.
TROUBLE IS, YOU MIGHT HAVE DIFFICULTY IN FINDING SOMEONE TO GIVE YOU A REFERENCE.
HANG ABOUT, THOUGH - HOW ABOUT A TELEVISION PRODUCER!!!
Not too subtle, perhaps, but I couldn't fault the writer for spelling or grammar, although a good editor might have queried the triple exclamation marks. I keep it on the wall for much the same reason that Roman emperors who were making a triumphal procession used to keep a slave standing behind them whose job was to whisper: 'Remember, Caesar, you are mortal.' In my case, the warning is: 'Remember, Robinson, some of the punters out there think your stuff is crap.'
And that's their
privilege. In the long run it's readers,
not authors, who decide whether or not a book makes the grade. I
because I get some very generous emails which may not be statistically
representative. Kieran in Buckinghamshire reckons that the RFC
'without doubt the best aerial combat books I have ever read'. From
All that is on the plus side. I don't hear from readers who throw my book at the cat, say it's unreadable, and go down the pub instead. I don't hear from them because they're not going to waste a stamp on me, but I'm sure they exist. They probably won't read this, which is a pity because Chris Buckham, who is a major in the Canadian Armed Forces, found depths in the novels that surprised even me. He recommends that Junior Air Force Officers under his command should read them, and his analysis of Piece of Cake tells why:
'Dark humour underscores a theme throughout that speaks to the individual character's means of dealing with the realities of war. The strength of the book lies in its development of its characters and its insights into the human psyche. The Commanding Officers and Flight Commanders struggle with the changes that war brings in their relationships within the Squadron between themselves and the young line pilots. Conversely, the line pilots struggle themselves as they grapple with the deadliness of their chosen profession. Leadership strengths and weaknesses make themselves felt more keenly and shortfalls are quickly tolerated less or are forgiven. This novel captures the essence of the effects of combat on unit cohesion and command. It is stark and uncomfortable but it highlights lessons that are best learned and understood before the guns start firing.'
Which - as Chris points out - unfortunately doesn't always happen.
Finally, a double
whammy of praise in another unsuspected
place. John Sandford is an American novelist, much read on both
'The day was a nice one, the beginning of warmer weather, and the college girls were coming out of their winter cocoons, walking along with their form-fitting jeans and soft breast-clinging tops.
Maybe get a novel, Jake thought: he'd just read the first of a series of novels about British fliers during World War 1, by Derek Robinson, and was anxious to get another. And, of course, university bookstores were the most likely place to find his own books; like most authors, he always checked.'
(True. Jake finds a couple of his own books 'in what he thought was an obscure location', so he quietly reshelves them in a better spot. He also buys a copy of Goshawk Squadron.)
'With a sense of satisfaction, he walked across the street, got a bagel with cream cheese and sat on a bench in the sun and started reading about the Goshawks.'
Thanks, John. Always nice to get an unsolicited testimonial from someone in the same line of work.
My thanks to all who wrote. Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #17 January 2011
Bristle with pride,
The wide blue yonder in deepest Texas,
and hilarity from Surrey to Florida.
Back in the days
when I was fairly broke, I came up with a
spoof glossary of the
dialect in my home town,
spawned half a dozen sequels. Today,
forty years on, it's still in print; and
if I'm known for anything in
Which reminded me
of what happened ten years ago, when the
British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterologists, Hepatologists and
Nutritionists met in
Life is full of
surprises. I had heard that copies of A Good
Clean Fight, my SAS and RAF novel set in North Africa, found their
US Marines serving in
A different kind of
surprise came from Joe in Austin, Texas, who
- having read most of my
was "excited to find your website" and decided to
download Hullo Russia from
who supply Books On Tape. ("
Candidates for my Mile High Club keep appearing. Steve in Surrey, buying Red Rag Blues, says: "I've never read a book that even comes close to captivating me like yours do... I make a point of reading Piece of Cake at least once a year." And to prove it, he did something calculated to turn heads: "I laughed out loud on the train to work when I got to the point where Sticky reads out the cricket scores from the French radio truck." And there is similar laugh-aloud evidence from Edgewater, Florida, where Loraine writes that I'm her husband's favourite author, and she says, "I can always tell by the way he laughs that it is one of your books he's reading." (She bought Operation Bamboozle for him.) Alan in Wellington, New Zealand, bought Hullo Russia, having "recently done a mammoth re-read of all the RFC/RAF books and I loved them all over again." Penny,in Hertfordshire, a "big fan", wanted Hornet's Sting to complete her collection. And John in Portland, Oregon ("enjoyed many of your books very much") did the same.
My thanks to all who wrote. Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #18 March 2011
Hornets in Yonkers,
Hilarity and brutality in New Zealand,
and Robinson-mania in the Netherlands.
may remember the report from a fan, deep in the American West, who
bought a springer spaniel pup, or it might have been a fox terrier, and
christened it 'Moggy', as a way of preserving the memory of that other
maverick creature, Flying Officer Moggy Cattermole in Piece of Cake.
(His girlfriend renamed the pooch to something she could shout in the
park without feeling embarrassed. Trapper, I think. Or
Now I hear from Jane, on America's East Coast. She may qualify for my Double-Digit Club, having read Goshawk Squadron many times, and she adapts Woolley's line: "Ah, bloody (insert name). I hate the bastard" when she encounters bad drivers in up-State New York - and she immediately feels better. Which just goes to show that fiction can be powerful therapy.
More evidence of this from an old friend, John Walsh (who actually lives in up-State New York). He's teaching inner-city kids the basics of aviation by helping them build model airplanes. As a way of developing a group allegiance, he suggested they adopt a name, and so a dozen kids in Yonkers "call themselves (very loud and very proud, by the way) Hornet Squadron!". John is currently deep into my yarn of Hornet Squadron, A Good Clean Fight, for the third time. The book went with him all through the second Iraq war and back, so it's no surprise that the cover has fallen off.
Meanwhile, Tony in Nuneaton put another of mine through its paces. He writes: "My copy of Kentucky Blues has now been read by the whole family, including my 84-year-old mother-in-law, who loved it as much as I did!" He bought copies of Damned Good Show and Hullo Russia, Goodbye England. He builds and flies radio-controlled models and - perhaps inspired by Goshawk Squadron - decided to build an SE5a. Hendon air museum let him take a close look at their RFC replicas. His reaction: "Apart from the craftsmanship of it and all the other aircraft, my overriding impression was of their frailty. Little wonder the numbers shot down were far outweighed by accidents, equipment failure and training." Too true. An excellent book on the RFC, The First of the Few by Denis Winter (Allen Lane 1982) quotes the official total of casualties at the end of the war: of 14,166 dead pilots, 8,000 had died while training in the UK. No dual control in those days. You were on your own, the first time you took off. All too often it was your last.
They were young (18 or 19 was not uncommon) and the young laugh easily. So there was humour to be found in every squadron - or, as Alan in New Zealand sums up my war novels, "hilarious and brutal". Alan writes for the Journal of the Wellington Science Fiction Society, but he casts his net widely and it takes in non-sci-fi books as well. He's read everything I've published and his review in the Journal of Hullo Russia, Goodbye England - too long to print here in full - is on http://tyke.net.nz (go to 'wot i red' and then go to February 2011). It's the first novel of mine to be set in a time that he remembers. He was only a boy, but "I was nevertheless strongly affected by the almost palpable sense of fear engendered by the Cuban Missile Crisis. It seemed likely that the world I knew would not be there when I woke up in the morning. If I woke up in the morning."
And adds: "The thing that makes a Derek Robinson novel stand out from all the others that surround it is his impeccable understanding of history, his extraordinary ability to re-live it in context through the eyes and minds of the people to whom it is a contemporary happening, and the sharp, crackling and sometimes breathtakingly cynical wit of his dialogue and of his observations; a wit that is often laugh-out-loud funny but which makes you weep inside even while you are laughing so very hard at the piercing truth of it. Hullo Russia, Goodbye England is a genuine tour de force."
Mail arrives from elsewhere. Martin in SW6 has gone through all my books. He read Hornet's Sting in the office, "surreptitiously, almost under the table" - even the most tolerant of offices might have raised an eyebrow if he'd read it while completely under the table. The image of the two Russian flyers in France, "playing both the piano and poker fast and loose, demanding duels, has remained with me for 10+ years." Now he's suffering what another reader called 'withdrawal pains' and he asks urgently for "more needed for the summer please!!" Well, I'm working on it, and I hope something will appear in the summer, but - just as Woolley predicted the war would be over by Christmas but which Christmas he didn't know - I don't know which summer the new book will be ready. I had a financial adviser called Lewis, very good at his job, who used to ask me what I would earn next year. I always said I hadn't the faintest idea, which caused his brow to furrow. There are writerly types who crank out a novel a year, fair weather or foul. If only. Goshawk Squadron took me about nine months to write. (I was young and didn't know any better.) Piece of Cake took four years, and got derailed twice on the way. Kentucky Blues was an idea that refused to go away, but it took 25 years to germinate. How long will the new yarn take? As long as it likes.
Paul in Deal discovered Piece of Cake "when the children were young and to read half a chapter a night was an achievement". Now they're off to University and he ordered Hornet's Sting. Erwin in Holland is one of my repeat offenders, having read Cake for the 6th time. He found a secondhand copy in the UK with his girlfriend - now his wife - 20 years ago. He's read all the rest ("wonderful books") and now asked for Hullo Russia.
So did Joe, three thousand miles to the west in Ramsey, New Jersey. He sends thanks for my writing: "It puts me directly in a place in history I never knew (I'm 30 years old), and is so rich and alive that I can practically smell aircraft exhaust and fresh cut grass." Go back nearly four thousand miles to the east, where Stian in Rogoland, Norway. wrote his master's thesis on WW1 aviation and got "much enjoyment" from Goshawk Squadron, so he asked for the prequels, War Story and Hornet's Sting. He served with the Norwegian Army, and says: "You describe service culture quite well." Well, the military is the military wherever you go. Streaking south by ten thousand miles takes me to Steve in Te Anau, New Zealand. He found the same satisfaction as Stian: "I'm ex-RAAF, so I could relate to the military BS between squadron and upper echelon - it still goes on." Of Goshawk Squadron he says: "I couldn't put it down, really enjoyed the banter between pilots and the black humour, interlaced with vivid dogfight scenes." Zooming up to the USA and Michael in central Indiana ("currently reading A Good Clean Fight for the 10th time") works in community theatre and would like to adapt my RFC trilogy for the stage. I'm happy to give the project my blessing.
Finally, how about this...
I'm the guy in the glasses and the slightly worried smile on the right. The guy with the cheery grin is Bill Hitchings, confident that his camera is doing its stuff. Bill flew from Melbourne (reading Damned Good Show on the flight - "just as enthralling" as my other books) and he dropped in for a cup of tea. Good to meet him.
My thanks to all who wrote. Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #19 May 2011
Going where no university dared,
Matching Woolley Guinness for Guinness,
and the Agony Aunt Flies Again.
sort of book is Goshawk Squadron?
One family read it and the
husband thought it was a great adventure, his wife found it a moving
love story, and their teenage son laughed his socks off. I think each
was right - it's a story of young men who fall in love when
they're not fighting for their lives, and make the blackest of jokes if
As it was my first novel, people sometimes ask me why I wrote it. Was it for the combat, or the romance, or the humour? The answer is all of those and more. I wrote it for the history. Nobody had written a brutally honest book about the Royal Flying Corps and I wanted to fill the vacuum. I wrote it for me, and if anyone else liked it, well, that would be a bonus. Luckily for me, the bonus happened and Goshawk still gets readers all over the world.
I realised the wider truth about that vacuum when I saw a review by David Aaronovitch of a book called 'Civilisation' by Niall Ferguson. One cause of the recent economic disaster, so Ferguson claimed, was that few bankers knew anything about the 1929 Crash, and he blamed that failure on the last 30 years of education. Aaronovitch shot that notion down in flames. When he studied modern history at Oxford 35 years ago, he said, nothing after 1914 was taught. He got Gladstone but not the Depression. Same happened to me when I was studying history at Cambridge in the Fifties. The biggest events of the century, the two World Wars, were out of bounds. But they had influenced everyone's lives, including mine, and they were exactly what I wanted to understand. Later, when I could, I researched them. And wrote some books. My fiction is based solidly on fact. The stories may be ripping yarns, but they're also reliable history.
And if a reader prefers the yarn to history, that's fine by me. Darren in New Zealand writes that he gets unusual satisfaction from Goshawk. He "acquired a copy 25-odd years ago in a pub in South Wales after a bollox-freezing game against some feral team from the valleys. I've carted that book around ever since. To add a bit of realism to the story, every time Woolley reaches for a Guinness, I do the same." The first chapter is a bit of a challenge - Woolley sinks a few - but "after that it's downhill all the way." Amazing.
Equally impressive are the model-makers. Keith in Leeds bought a copy of A Good Clean Fight. This is a sequel to Cake, and it follows Fanny Barton and his Hornet Squadron in the Desert War, where they fly the P40 Tomahawk. Keith plans to build scale models, and asked my permission to use my initials as squadron recognition letters on the planes. I'm flattered. And Peter in Nottingham bought Cake and Hullo Russia, Goodbye England (he describes himself as "a complete Vulcan nerd - I've been in the cockpits of six of the survivors"). He's a semi-pro in the model business - he's sold a few of his WW2 tanks to film companies - and, inspired by A Good Clean Fight, he's not only built models of the Tomahawk but also photographed them flying low over the desert. Look closely and you might see the shark's teeth on the nose. Very convincing.
What next? I'm Stone Age Man when it comes to the more exotic workings of the Internet, so the doings of Steve in Victoria, Oz, leave me gasping. He bought Hornet's Sting (thus completing his trilogy) and told me that he and a group of like-minded enthusiasts are "flying Rise of Flight (a WW1 flight sim) over the Internet". Actually flying? "Check us out on Oceanic Wing ," Steve suggested, so I did. These guys recreate WW1 aircraft (and others) that are so realistic that they can fly (and fight) them. Astonishing. Their website also has a books page with some enthusiastic remarks about my stuff, so they're obviously well-read too.
A quick whizz through other mail. Christine in Southampton was stumped for something to give her ex-RAF dad on his 89th birthday, and then found that he'd read my Damned Good Show and was "completely blown away by how authentic and realistic your book is". So she bought him a copy of Cake and one of Hullo Russia. Problem solved. Leon in Woking also bought Hullo Russia, and added that Cake "remains for me the perfect novel in terms of content, pace, characters, dialogue, depth, everything!" and urges me to keep writing. Well, I do my best. John in Japan bought an armful of books and asked: "Why on earth hasn't War Story been either made into a movie or televised?" Good question. The movie/TV business is a total mystery to me too. Howard in Santa Cruz, California, had the initiative to email my new publisher and tell him that printed editions of some of my books "are available only in the range of $100" and he urged him to issue all my stuff as eBooks - which, in fact, my publisher is now in the middle of setting up. (100 bucks is a crazy price, brought about simply by the fact that some books are scarce. At one stage, specialist book dealers were asking over £200 for a used copy of Hornet's Sting - which is why I decided to self-publish it for a fraction of that price.) And finally Steven, I don't know where, tells me that years ago he bought A Good Clean Fight, couldn't get into it, threw it down in disgust (too young to appreciate it, he thinks), picked it up later and loved it - especially the relationship between Schramm and Maria Grandinetti. As a result, he says: "I've always promised myself, in the event of a lady deciding to 'love me for five minutes', to take the bull by the horns." Go for it, Steve. You never know. Five minutes could last a lifetime.
My thanks to all who wrote.
Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #20 August 2011
The roller-coaster of books,
Shock-horror at MGM,
and mobilising the mental juices.
Computers get a bit of
stick nowadays for what they do to
reading and writing - everyone is stuck to the
it's said, and nobody writes a real letter any more. But there's
angle. The Internet has been good for books (if not for
in Toronto tells me that, 19 years ago, "My father introduced me to Goshawk
Squadron when I was 13" (a round of applause for fathers like
"but I only just started reading your other novels, obtained secondhand
over the 'Net, as most seem to be out of print." Too true, but
leaning on my publisher to revive them. Peter ordered copies of Hornet's
Sting and Hullo
Meanwhile, a longtime fan, David in Malaysia, tipped me off to something my publisher had failed to tell me, which is that their reissue of Piece of Cake and Hullo Russia, Goodbye England has been postponed from this October to next February. There's a reason: the designer we had lined up to create the new covers dropped out and so we're starting from scratch. Book covers are what the Promotion Department needs in order to do their job. One bit of good news: you can now get (if that's your taste) my RFC trilogy (War Story, Hornet's Sting, Goshawk Squadron) as e-books on Amazon/Kindle. Swings and roundabouts. Or snakes and ladders. Maybe ham and eggs. Take your pick.
The moral of the story, I suppose, is to soldier on and hope the good and the bad luck even out. Take the case of the American Hugh Martin, a nice guy and a talented lyricist and composer. He died a few months ago, aged 96. During the Second World War he co-wrote several hits, including a number called The Trolley Song ('Clang, clang, clang went the trolley, Ding, ding, ding went the bell, Zing, zing, zing went my heartstrings. From the moment I saw you, I fell...') which, if you're one of the younger fellahs, you may never have heard. But in 1944 Judy Garland belted it out in the movie Meet Me in St Louis, and it helped make her a star.
Hugh Martin kept
working and in 1957 he had another
hit. Bear in mind that by 1957 the world looked a grim and gloomy
The Korean War had ended in stalemate. Nuclear tests were exploding in
parts. The Soviet Union had the first satellites circling the globe,
Have yourself a merry little Christmas,
It may be your last,
Next year we may all be living in the past.
The studio turned it down flat. Bittersweet and nostalgic they might accept, they said, but not a dirge. Martin got to work and rewrote the last two lines:
Let your heart be light;
Next year all our troubles will be out of sight.
And of course
Martin lived to see his song become as
immortal as anything can be in showbiz. Was he sorry to lose the
which he felt had expressed the world in 1957? Probably.
But he was
a professional. He was in the entertainment business. So am I.
foremost, I write novels that entertain. If they also take the
somewhere he might never otherwise have gone, and make him think
little - what the film director Sidnet Lumet
"stimulating thought and setting the mental juices flowing
" - well, that's a bonus. Lumet managed it
such fine movies as Twelve Angry Men, Network and Dog Day
Afternoon. Whether I manage it is entirely up to the
reader, but I'm
encouraged when I hear from Peter in Portishead (the town, not the
first read Goshawk Squadron as a boy, "while hunkered
the bedclothes with a torch." Since then it's been with him in
first Gulf War,
Readers Write #21 October 2011
Literary lions stumble,
Confessions of an invisible man,
And explosions of brilliance in Dublin
Why do writers
write? I ask because Bud, in
And a different
author. I'm not the same scribbler I
was twenty, thirty years ago, and what may seem worth exploring
unknown territory then. As someone once said: How do I know what
until I see what I've said? Except that, in my case, I
know what I've said until you, the reader, points it out to me.
novel is a gamble, and even the best writers stumble, once in a while.
Louis Stevenson and P.G.Wodehouse - two names you rarely
see in the
same sentence - each wrote a stinker or two. They
thought the yarns were a good idea at the time. (Nobody sits down
thinks: I'll waste a year or two on a real turkey.)
end product was a big mistake. OK, if you insist, I'll tell you
titles: Stevenson's Catriona (poor sequel to Kidnapped; David
Balfour falls in love with the childish Catriona who, as Stevenson
"as virginal as billy-ho!") and
Back to the beginning. Why do writers write? Bill, somewhere in the US, came across Piece of Cake in the library of the US Naval Hospital in Portsmouth, Virginia, enjoyed it immensely, cruised through my RFC and RAF series and, he says, "to some modest degree, they shaped the man I am today." He's seen life: after the Navy he became a paramedic and a firefighter. He adds that "Frankly, after my father, you and Bernard Cornwell have been my biggest and most positive role models." I was startled. I take what you said as a compliment, Bill, but I'm not sure I'm comfortable being a role model. After all, I'm the invisible man in the room. I just tell the story and let the reader make what he likes of it. Two characters I've invented - Stanley Woolley in Goshawk Squadron and Moggy Cattermole in Cake - are not the sort of men you'd want your daughter to marry. Yet they score strongly with readers. I don't know where I found them. Sometimes I think the door was left open and they wandered in. That's how Skull arrived in Cake (and other books). They're all lucky accidents. But role models?
It's easy to say why writers don't write. Not for the money. Writing novels is a precarious business. The Inland Revenue taxes me by estimating what it reckons I'll earn next year, which is total guesswork based on what I made last year. Like most freelance writers, my income goes up and down like a roller-coaster, so the Revenue get it wrong as often as right. If you want steady money, I'd recommend a career as a chartered accountant.
fame? It's not much of a reward. It
certainly won't pay for the groceries. A good review in the newspapers
welcome, as long as you remember that it'll wrap tomorrow's fish and
Fame is fleeting, and so are novels. Nearly all the heavyweight
bestselling authors who dominated the fiction lists when I was a boy
are out of
print now and largely forgotten. Will my stuff be around fifty years
now? Do I care? Not much. I'm not writing for posterity (it
did me anything for me). And look at what happened to J.M.Synge, who
Playboy of the Western World. The play's opening night, in
Synge's crime was
to write a play without Irish
Quick round-up of
my mail. Jim in
And Ben, now in his final year at school, having not only read my RFC trilogy but also got his mother and mother to read it - "an achievement of sorts" - is writing a 5,000-word project as an A-Level extension. His subject: Hitler's Operation Sealion and the truth about the role of Fighter Command in the non-invasion of 1940.....a topic I've looked at in my Invasion 1940. Meaty stuff.
My thanks to all who wrote.Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
Readers Write #22 January 2012
a Goshawk with clipped wings,
and no good deed goes unpunished
The Royal Flying Corps is almost a hundred
years old. A reader of my RFC trilogy today is in a comparable position
someone in 1912 who was reading about the
Somewhat north of
Perhaps. But if Sealion had sailed in a flat calm, the Royal Navy was ready and waiting.
Europeans are often so fluent in English
that they put us Brits to shame, and Boris in Frankenburg,
Leap ten thousand miles to the south-east
(which of course is no barrier to the Internet) and Liz in
Now jump another few thousand miles to
One thing is definite. I shan't be doing any business in all of February 2012. The shop will be shut while the computer gets thoroughly overhauled, oiled and polished. So - please save your emails for March.
My thanks to all who wrote.
A curtain-call for extras,
gunplay in the bathroom,
and laughing fit to bust
The folk-singer Fred Wedlock, now alas no longer with us, once told me the secret of how to create a statue of a horse. "Get a big block of stone," he said, "and hack off everything that doesn't look like horse." There are days when writing feels like making that statue, except that the chisel is blunt and the mallet has a handle made of rubber.
That's when I
reach for my omnibus edition of Raymond
Chandler's novels, partly for the pleasure of seeing a champion in
partly to remind myself that he had his bad days too, and partly to
that what matters (especially in a crime story) are the extras, the
characters whom Chandler crafted so beautifully. In The Lady
Lake, he has a scene where his private eye Philip Marlowe visits
Graysons, a retired couple who can probably provide some
'Grayson was a long stooped yellow-faced man with high shoulders, bristly eyebrows and almost no chin. The upper part of his face meant business. The lower part was just saying goodbye. He wore bifocals and had been gnawing fretfully at the evening paper.'
There is another link.
It goes back to long ago, when Hamish
Hamilton was publishing The Eldorado Network. By good
Machell was my editor - and Roger had also been
Chandler's editor for his British editions. He told me that one day his
rang and it was Chandler, calling from his home in La Jolla,
obviously very drunk. "I'm going to shoot myself," he said.
Roger, thinking fast, said, "Don't do that, Raymond. Let's talk about
it..." He heard two loud bangs. Then silence. Roger phoned the La Jolla
police, they hurried over and found
End of anecdote. But
what interested me was that when
Thanks to the Internet,
I get echoes of what I write in
emails from readers all over the globe. Of course praise is
(There is no limit to the flattery an author can absorb.) Bill,
Then - surprise, surprise - a letter from Guy, a very old pal (we were at college together, back in the Middle Ages). Recovering from a rather nasty illness, he had time to re-read my flying stories - 'Once again I was totally engrossed among the vivid characters. Their persuasive arguments and caustic banter make them so alive and such good company.' Enter his wife, to give him a copy of my non-fiction book, Invasion. 1940, and he says 'to my astonishment I was so hooked by the reasoning that I finished the whole of it before returning to the interrupted novel.' Well, I worked hard to make that slice of history as readable as any work of fiction, and I'm glad it paid off. Guy spent his National Service on a Motor Torpedo Boat, dashing up and down the Channel, so he has personal knowledge of those hazardous waters.
I'm delighted to hear that Guy's gremlins have been zapped. On the other hand, maybe the Luis Cabrillo quartet should have a health warning on the cover. L.L in New York 'picked up Red Rag Blues, ran across Cabrillo, the Fantonis and Chick Scatola (Mafiosi of varying competence) and began laughing so hard' that he ended up in hospital - although it's only fair to add that he was already suffering from a deep chest cold, so maybe Luis Cabrillo's con-artist doings simply hastened the doctor's decision. Anyway, I sent L.L. a copy of the sequel, Operation Bamboozle and he replied with thanks, saying: 'I look forward to reading BAMBOOZLE with a pacemaker handy.' Both books were fun to write, and I'm glad they're fun to read.My thanks to all who wrote, and to the many who sent me birthday greetings on Facebook - too many for me to answer.
Derek Robinson Previous Readers Write
Readers Write #24 June 2012
And Other Occupational Hazards
Critics are readers, too. At least, some are. I've known book reviewers who, pressed for time, just read the publisher's blurb on the back cover. Othere, with a little more time, glanced at every third page of the book, which they reckoned was enough to give them a feeling of whether or not it was any good. They have my sympathy. I've done their job myself, and it's a daunting prospect when you get given four or five thick books, all to be reviewed by next Tuesday.
That's why I value the advice of the best literary agent I ever had, the late George Greenfield. "Don't read your reviews," George said. "Measure them." Size equals impact.
Nevertheless, I did read them, if only to spot the mistakes. I remember a rather sniffy (but quite large) review of A Good Clean Fight by a man whom I knew to be an academic. He ended his piece by saying that I was shaky on jargon in the Desert Air Force, and that "the knowing reader" (meaning himself) "waits in vain for the squadron's Kittyhawks to be identified as 'Tommy Dodds'." Well, I research my books pretty thoroughly. I wrote and told him I'd never come across this nickname, so what was his source?
He apologised. He'd got it wrong. He had looked in The Concise Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional Usage and he'd misread the entry. It happens. I chalked it up to experience.
who get steamed-up by bad reviews are like actors who storm about bad
notices - too sensitive. After all, it's only one
man's or woman's opinion, and (as I've often said) no book is for
everybody. My first novel, Goshawk Squadron, got
some good reviews and some very bad ones. A respected writer in an
eminent magazine read Goshawk and his review advised me to
quit now and find a better job, such as digging ditches. My local radio
station asked Alan Gibson to review the book. He'd won a Double
away Woolley and the book vanishes. If Woolley had been simply a
four-letter word, he would be shallow and tedious, and the book
wouldn't be worth reading, then or now. Yet, in
the years since Alan's review, there have been at least six
editions of Goshawk Squadron and several
translations. MacLehose Press will bring out a new edition later this
on from Goshawk Squadron to Piece of Cake. It was
widely reviewed in
"Robinson's characters are not much more than his historical revelations," he wrote. "The cast consists of cliches." And he spelled out what he most disliked: the pilots are "virtual subversives and delinquents, sarcastic wits skilled at insubordination, drunken, sadistic, nutty, scared to death, welcoming as an inestimable benefaction every day clouded over and unfit for flying." Not the book I remembered writing. And his account was odd, because later Fussell found fault with the way I 'romanticized' the squadron: "No group of pilots could be so charmingly intelligent and verbal, so gifted at Noel Coward repartee..."
puzzled me that Fussell could wish to have it both ways, finding the
pilots so repellent yet so charming.And my guess is that one reason why
Piece of Cake has been reprinted so often, and is now
reissued by MacLehose Press, is that Fussell totally misunderstood the
book. Readers like the characters he hated; they even like
dodgy types like Moggy Cattermole. They enjoy the humour. Former
RAF aircrew tell me that the dialogue is convincing, that
aircrew banter was very like mine (and still is). As a
history of the first year of WW2 in the air, the book is accurate and
authentic, but what brings readers to return to it again and again is
their recognition of the characters, of their enjoyment of life and the
abrupt fact of their death.
Fussell's review was a long time ago, and now he too has died, on 23
May 2012, aged 88, an acclaimed literary scholar. In 1944 he fought
coincidence, as I was writing this column, an email arrived from
an old fan, Martin in the
Thanks also to Robert in Texas, Max in East
Sussex, John in Edinburgh, Chris in West Australia, Jonathan in Surrey,
and Sam in Devon - and to everyone who wrote.
Readers Write #25 July 2012
Stooging down The Mall,
Strafing the literary festivals,
and Moggy on the analyst's couch.
Readers Write #26 September 2012
and stoked in the USA.
In my last RW, I took a poke at literary festivals and how they distract writers from the business of writing, so this time I'll have a go at mega-hyper-super-bestsellers. Friends - intrigued by the soaring runaway sales of the Grey trilogy - have asked me how I feel about it. Depressed? (Why not my book?) Elated? (Bookshops full of punters.) Astonished? (Nobody saw it coming.) None of the above.
Freaks happen. Back in the 1930s, someone wrote a song called Yes, We Have No Bananas. It swept the country. People were singing it everywhere Music publishers must have looked at each other and said 'No Bananas is a hit? World's gone crazy.' Well, every now and then it does go crazy, and publishing is no exception, especially when word-of-mouth gets into the act. Many years ago, a New York publisher put out a novel called Jonathan Livingstone Seagull. Without enthusiasm, and with no hopes of making a dollar from it, because the story was about a bored seagull who seeks perfection in flight and finds wisdom, together with two other radiant and loving seagulls. Well, somebody liked it, told his friends, and the rest is history. Also economics, because Seagull not only topped the New York Times Best Seller List, for two years it was the best-selling book in the USA. It became a movie. (Neil Diamond sang the songs.) Critics panned the book - one said that, by comparison, The Little Engine That Could was 'a work of some depth and ambition' - but who cared? It was everywhere. It was a freak. These things happen.
In fact they've been happening ever since the 1890s, when publishing stopped grinding out three-volume sagas to amuse the rich and idle and began offering cheap fiction to the masses. The sales of Mrs James's Grey trilogy aren't particularly huge, compared with the scores racked up by the literary giants of Edwardian times and the years between the wars. When Edgar Wallace was going strong, it was reckoned that, apart from the Bible, one in four books bought in England was an Edgar Wallace thriller. Ethel M.Dell, the Mills & Boon of her day, almost matched him. But for really big money and colossal ego, nobody got near Marie Corelli. In the 1900s, her novels earned her (in modern money) a million pounds a year, and she had the longest entry in Who's Who. She lived at Stratford-on-Avon in a style that makes our own dear Barbara Cartland seem like a shrinking violet. Marie had a coach pulled by two Shetland Ponies, in which she progressed around Stratford every day, with the coachman perched above and behind . Her Venetian gondola took her on the Avon, with a genuine Italian steering it. Why not? The eggheads said her books were sentimental junk, but she claimed to be the most widely read writer, in English and in translation, in the world. And she probably was.
But not forever. In 1908, Hall Caine's novel was (he said) the first to sell a million copies in Britain; and then came Nat Gould's prodigious output - 130 novels, all about horse-racing. By 1927 he'd sold 24 million copies and was still going strong. Corelli had fame, but Nat had more readers. So where does the Grey trilogy slot into this pantheon? Modestly, when you look at (for example) Terry Pratchett's 45 million sales - and he's just one of many in the record books. Thomas the Tank Engine has sold 200 million copies. So has Enid Blyton's Noddy. Erle Stanley Gardner's Perry Mason books have reached 300 million. J.K.Rowling's Harry Potter series tips the scale at 450 million. Vast forests have been felled to make the paper for these blockbusters. So why don't I feel jealous? Two reasons.
One reason is that those authors did things their way, and I do mine my way. I can't crank out a book a year. It takes me two or three, sometimes four or five years to write a book. The other reason is that I have different expectations. I don't aim for the bestseller market (although I'd be happy if it happened). I aim to put all that blood, sweat and ink into writing a book that will stick around for ten or twenty years. The readers who are willing to pay good money for my stuff are probably a minority - a discerning and demanding minority, but too few to generate sales in the millions. Part of my reward is knowing that Goshawk Squadron, for example, is still in print, forty years on. (MacLehose Press's reissue will appear in January 2013.) I hold nothing against Mrs James and the ballistic sales of her Grey books. Good luck to her, especially as a big chunk of the income will go to H.M. Treasury. Meanwhile, I take pleasure in the kind of email that money can't buy, from a fan in Fairfax, Virginia.
Fred, who is one of the discerning and demanding minority, "drifted
back" to my website "after a long absence" and, he says, "I'm glad I
did. I am stoked, stoked about A Splendid Little War. I
am assuming that some of our friends from the RFC trilogy will
appear." Not many, Fred. The year is 1919, and very few of
my RFC characters survived what was known as the Great War. But 'the
whiff of battiness and brimstone' (in the words of one reviewer)
is still there.
Fred being in the U.S., I regret to say that the American edition of Splendid will not appear when the book is published here and in the rest of the English-speaking world, in January 2013. MacLehose Press/Quercus are still sorting out their relationship with North America. You'll know the outcome when I do. Incidentally, Fred's refreshingly new adjective, stoked, is surely one to note. My guess is that it means 'over the moon'. I look forward to its appearance on this side of the Atlantic.
From the opposite side of the globe, Liam in Darwin, Australia sends a short but bracing note. He teaches history. One of his 10th grade students was reluctant to read books of any kind, so Liam gave him War Story, my yarn of the RFC in 1916. "He is powering through it and enjoying it immensely," Liam says. Liam and other teachers "plan to use some historical fiction as sources when we teach WW2." And already, Piece of Cake is going down well at the school. Brilliant idea.
My thanks to all who wrote.
Readers Write #27 October 2012
Peregrine Delancey gets his comeuppance,
boos and cheers for HRGE,
and barnstorming over Winsconsin.
I live close by a large university, and if I'm driving past it when the lectures end and the streets are suddenly flooded with students, I have learned to avoid the deaf and the blind. These are students wandering across the road, with an i-pod in an ear, a bottle of water in one hand and a mobile phone in the other. They are texting the entire world, oblivious to traffic and obsessed with junk. That's just my opinion, of course; but I wonder whether any text message is worth the risk of getting turned into strawberry jam. Especially when you consider the damage already being done to the English language by the galloping impatience of text talk. If enough people go on texting 'u', will the day come when they don't know whether it's spelt 'you' or 'yew'? Good English matters. It can make a big difference to anyone writing to impress as well as to inform. If you don't know the difference between 'discreet' and 'discrete', or between 'affect' and 'effect', or between 'exercise' and 'exorcise', you run the danger of looking like a total moppet instead of the hot stuff you're trying to be.
I mention this because I've just had a letter from a firm of private bankers. I'll call them Peregrine Delancey because that's not their real name - which sounds as if they're waiting to be knighted, and so does Peregrine Delancey. (If there really is a Peregrine Delancey out there, I apologise in advance.)
P.D. made me an interesting offer. They would manage my wealth and take a minimum fee of only £1,250 a year. Now, the writing game is precarious (today, steak and chips; tomorrow, bread and cheese), and by sheer bad luck I not only have no loose wealth but also no spare £1,250. Still, it was nice of P.D. to offer. Then I reached para 3 of their letter, where they talk about 'principle partners', and suddenly their letter turned to ashes in my hands.
'Principle partners' is gibberish. All partners in any bank have principles; it's what keeps them out of jail. What Peregrine Delancey meant was 'principal partners'. Simple mistake - but a bank that plays fast and loose with the English language is never going to gets its hands on my wealth, if I ever have any. That letter was worse than a waste; it was a reason not to trust them. It was an unbusiness letter. Good English matters.
OK. End of pontification. On to readers write. Bad English is about the only thing that Paul (somewhere in UK) didn't find wrong with Hullo Russia, Goodbye England. He felt that I skimmed the surface of the Cold War, produced characters who are two-dimensional and glib, and treated the real issues in a way that was almost meaningless. Also, I made a poor job of explaining the workings of the Vulcan bomber, the book is too short, and in general it descended to the level of juvenile fiction such a Biggles. He's an 'avid lover' of my other stuff, but he rates HRGE as a dud, and hopes I'll do better next time.
This was a comprehensive demolition, and it proves a point I've often made, which is that no book is for everybody. That (and a lot more) is what I said in my reply to him. I mentioned that some readers, including ex-Vulcan aircrew, enjoyed HRGE very much; but I can't, and don't, hope to please everyone. I talked about an old friend who told me that Goshawk Squadron would be a much better story if only I would get rid of that bloody awful Major Woolley. And Paul replied to say that Woolley is 'probably my favourite character', and maybe if he (Paul) had read the prequel to HRGE, Damned Good Show - which introduces Silko - then he might have felt differently about the book. Turns out that Paul is a playwright. (We wordsmiths have strong feelings about stuff.) We parted company amiably. He looks forward to A Splendid Little War, out soon. Will he like it or loathe it? Every book is a gamble.
Then I got a 'quick note of appreciation for HRGE' from Gareth, here in the UK, who 'just finished the ebook and enjoyed it immensely'. He declares an interest: his father, a Vulcan pilot, was actually sitting in one of the QRA Vulcans, ready for action, during the Cuban missile crisis. His dad - who, at 85, plays three rounds of golf a week - has no doubt that he would have 'actually pressed the button over Moscow', because he would have known that all his family, in married quarters near the runway, would be dead from a Soviet first strike. Makes you think.
The madness of Mutual Assured Destruction is at the heart of HRGE, and yet there is comedy too. Gareth writes: 'I am pleased that you managed to reflect some of the humour of the pilots. My recollection (as a small boy) was that they were always laughing.' The novel mentions the black eye patches issued to pilots, to protect one eye if the other was blinded by a nuclear flash. 'Very glad you got the eye patches into the narrative,' Gareth adds. 'I can recall finding one of these and my father telling me that it was for a Captain Hook fancy dress costume he was going to wear to the mess!'
Martin in London has already pre-booked a copy of A Splendid Little War - and 'pre-booked a day off in early January to read it from cover to cover'. And says 'I love the front cover', which is on view on the Quercus website. And an old pal, John in New York State, tells me that he was in Iowa recently, flying a 1934 Aeronca C-3. 'Cows disturbed, probably made butter, and horses none too happy with the thought of a plane that's about 80 years old buzzing just overhead at 500 ft.' Here's what the Aeronca looks like on the ground. Sporty little model.
John can fly almost anything. In the summer he joined 'a barnstorming tour of the MidWest along with 14 other guys in planes from 1928-1933 (I got to fly a 1932 Fairchild 22)' which they flew 'in our own little dawn patrol over the trenches of Wisconsin'. When he's not flying, John is expert at carving propellers for RFC replicas; right now he's working on four props (birch) for Sopwith Snipes and two (mahogany) for Sopwith Pups. During the barnstorming, someone stole his copy of Piece of Cake (I don't think he travels anywhere without it). 'So please tell the powers that be to get off their asses (or fingers out) and make it available in the U.S. sooner rather than later.' I keep poking Quercus in the ribs, John.
Cue Garth in Manhattan, who keeps re-reading Cake and A Good Clean Fight, and has a couple of questions. (1) 'How did Baggy Bletchley survive being strafed on the bog (while trapped by his knackers) in Piece of Cake? Re-reading the sequence I can see it's just barely possible, but the mobile lavatory is described as being bowled over and over by German fire. (2) There's a scene in AGCF where Pip Patterson breaks down while remembering an old pal, a guy who saved his life and was such a good pilot Pip was certain the Germans would never get him. Then, of course, they did. Fanny Barton listens quietly, he's seen this again and again.....Once, the narrative tells us, it had even happened to him. So what I'm wondering is, is Fanny thinking about the ultimate fate of CH3?'
My answer to question one is simple. Baggy Bletchley's predicament is based on a true story, involving the master of a freighter, caught with his pants down in a rolling sea; and Baggy survives the attack because, after a quick strafe, any lowflying Me109 would seek out more rewarding targets on an airfield. And air commodores are tougher than they look. Question two sent me to page 264 of AGCF, where Pip's sad memories and Fanny Barton's thought occur. Bear in mind that all this takes place in the spring of 1942. Who knows what has happened to Fanny in the 18 months since the Battle of Britain? Almost certainly, he has known good pilots who got the chop. Maybe he was thinking of CH3. Seven American pilots flew in the Battle and six were killed in action afterwards. The final lines of Cake describe Barton and CH3 emptying their guns on German bombers. After that, anything was possible.
To close, a word about stoked, which cropped up in my last RW when an American reader used it to express his large enthusiasm for the coming publication of ASLW. I wondered at the strangeness of this adjective. Now, a kind and anonymous pal tells me that 'stoked' began life in Southern California, where surfers and skateboarders use it as shorthand for saying they're completely and intensely enthusiastic, exhilarated or excited about something. For example: "I'm stoked about going to California!" The word has reached the East Coast, so it should appear in the UK soon. Tell me if you hear it.
My thanks to all who wrote.
Halley's Comet strikes again,
The high price of Norwegian literacy,
and 'stoked' spans the globe.
A Splendid Little War is out, and the Daily Express gives it 5 stars (for full
review, click here). The launch took me to a gathering of booksellers the other
night. (What is the collective noun? A volume of booksellers? A sequence? A
binding?) I made a very brief speech, just four minutes - there was food and
drink waiting - about how and why I wrote ASLW. The novel tells the story of an
R.A.F. squadron during the Intervention in
It seems I was slightly wrong. This happens as rarely as a visit by Halley's Comet, but when it does I'm willing to admit it.
Mike, having been 'thoroughly entertained by ASLW, writes that it reminded him that 'I studied the conflict between the White and the Red Russians when at school'. (Sounds like a better school than mine, where the history syllabus said nothing much happened after the Boer War.) Mike goes on: 'I found it fascinating then, but was not old enough to understand the wider implications which come to life so well in ASLW.'
Steve also enjoyed ASLW, in his case all the more so because back in the 1980s he'd read a John Harris novel, aimed at teenagers, all about the Intervention. It was called The Interceptors, and its cover showed a Camel flying low over a line of cavalry. (The book must be pretty rare today - a used copy costs £45 on the Internet.) Steve especially enjoyed ASLW for 'the way you've blended real and imagined events', and he got 'a real sense of what life was like for those men (and one woman!)'. Which is what a novel should do: take the reader somewhere he would otherwise never go.
Speaking of money, my eyebrows jumped an
inch when Jon Gunnar in
Just across the Baltic, Erwin in the
Graham in the
Something that several people mention is their pleasure at coming across familar faces in ASLW, meaning Lacey (the former Orderly Room corporal) and Brazier (the adjutant). They first appeared in War Story and then played a larger part in Hornet's Sting. Lacey, the least warlike man in the books, believes that war may be hell but that's no reason why the squadron shouldn't live in black-market luxury. Brazier is the opposite: a warhorse who breathes fire and reads King's Regulations for pleasure. I've enjoyed their contribution to three novels. Who knows? They may live again in a fourth.
A last word about 'stoking'. We traced the
origin of this cheerful adjective to the beach boys of
My thanks to all who wrote. Derek Robinson Return to Homepage
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Readers Write #29 March 2013
My thanks to all who wrote. Derek Robinson
Return to Homepage
Readers Write #30 May 2013
Lucky, lucky Charles Dash,
Rolling a Tiger,
and the truth about Deflection Shooting.
April was a good month. Maybe newspaper editors have a soft spot for authors who hit eighty with the pen still in their hands. Anyway. The Times book section gave Goshawk Squadron (plus all my flying novels) a half-page review, with a photograph that also shows, hanging on the wall, a soft-focus picture of one of the Spitfires used in filming Piece of Cake. (To read the review, click on the link in the panel above.)
Meanwhile, a message arrived by cleft stick from Matthew, who lives not a thousand miles from me. Having read Goshawk Squadron years ago, he took the plunge and read War Story and Hornet's Sting. (All my RFC/RAF books are now available as MacLehose Press paperbacks.) 'Great stuff,' Matthew writes. 'Best novels I've read for years. I gave a copy of Hornet's Sting
to a chum who used to command 2/2 squadron of the SAS and he called me to say he'd finished it quicker than he had a book for years, and praised in particular the pre/post fighting atmosphere.'
Then Matthew raised a question that gets to the very heart of Hornet's Sting. 'Who shagged Dash?' he asked. Most queries from readers are about the horsepower of the Sopwith Pup, or the whereabouts of St Oscar's, an alleged public school where Woolley claimed to have been educated. (He lied. Saint Oscar never existed.) Now Matthew went straight to the nub of chapter 3. Charles Dash was a young RFC pilot who, on horseback, got lost in a snowstorm as night fell. He found himself at a nunnery, empty of nuns but occuped by six stunningly beautiful members of F.A.N.Y., the First Aid Nursing Yeomanry. They gave him a hot bath and a delicious supper and a bed for the night, during which some kind lady entered his room and relieved him of his virginity. Perhaps two kind ladies, hard to tell when everything was totally black. All he knew for certain was that she was, or they were, either Chloe Legge-Barrington, Edith Reynolds, Laura da Silva, Nancy Hicks-Potter, Jane Brackenden, or Lucy Knight. Later, he returned to the nunnery and was similarly rewarded; but by whom? And when he planned a third visit, they'd all gone. Moved on. War is hell.
Now you know as much as I do. Chloe, Edith, Laura, Nancy, Jane, or Lucy? You decide. I just tell the story. Nobody said the author had to know everything.
one of your RFC or RAF novels would learn as much (if not more!) about the experience of the past than from reading just a dry history textbook' - a point that some teenagers (and even their teachers) have made in the past. Paraag is working on an RFC novel, avoiding my style and seeking his own: a wise choice. I wish him well. Another longtime fan, Jan in
I'd heard that the Tiger is a delight to fly but somewhat lethal if you try to roll it, and Jan confirmed this. He gave step-by-step instructions for attempting to roll the aircraft, including the possible disastrous conclusion, but added: 'Having said that, I have been in a Tiger with a guy that did everything. Slow rolls, barrel rolls, loops, Immelmann's and even a slight tail slide and stall turn. But then there are pilots and weekend warriors. You need to know which tribe you belong to and stick with it.' Good advice.
Finally: I came across an old letter from Ernest (I
know not where) who said good things about my books and urged me to keep
going, which was rewarding since it came from a man who had flown
Hurricanes, Spitfires and even the Me-109 ('an uncomfortable gadget, designed
for nasty midgets,' he said, 'which changed its response from agile to
impossible to handle, depending on the flight envelope. I loathed it.') He
wrote that he didn't understand 'why people describe deflection shooting as
aiming in front. If you do that, you miss behind; you have to swing the
gun/aircraft/tennis racket/golfclub through from behind, fire when you
pass the target and keep swinging, on pheasant, grouse, ME's and golfballs. You
brush the target out of the air. Aiming with the gunsight means you lose the
enemy.' There you have it, from one who has been at the sharp end.
My thanks to all who wrote.
Derek Robinson Previous Readers Write
Readers Write #31 July 2013 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Call me Lance, dear, you can trust me,
News from Nowhere: a Blast from the Past,
and a poke in the chops in total silence.
Moggy Cattermole continues to intrigue readers. A squadron leader
who actually did lead a squadron in the Battle of Britain summed him up very
well: "Bad for discipline but good for morale. Every squadron
should have one - but only one." Now Hugh, who
says he's enjoyed all my books and was happy to find A Splendid Little War
in e-book form (he was in
David, an old pal (
A word about readers' emails. Writing novels is an odd job.
For two years, maybe more, nobody sees the story but me. Then it's
published and vanishes. Who's reading it? Where? Is anybody reading it? What do
they think? Often, the Internet answers. The other day I got this
brief email from Rob, a Scottish librarian: 'I am delighted you have finally a
deal which enabled your novels to be restocked by our libraries. At the moment
I have 5 out on loan which makes me happy as a pig in shit'
- news that I found both encouraging and refreshing: three
cheers for Scottish librarians! Phil in
That same week came an e-mail from Joseph in
(Pity about the cigarette. I'm a non-smoker, and so is everyone in my novels.) Today, Joe is re-reading the trilogy, discovering things he'd forgotten or never realised. What struck him was that Mackenzie and Woolley first appear in Hornet's Sting; Mackenzie is killed.and Woolley mentions his loss at the start of Goshawk Squadron - which I wrote umpteen years before Hornet's Sting. And that leads Joe to suggest that 'you must have had the entire RFC Trilogy sketched out in your mind before you wrote the first line of Goshawk Squadron.' It's a nice thought, Joe, but the truth is I wrote Goshawk with no idea of sequels or prequels. All that came much later, out of the blue. A quick note from Chris: having just read Goshawk and Sting, 'I am trying not to start reading War Story immediately. I suspect I won't succeed.' Go ahead, Chris. Give in.
Then came an e-mail from Jim and his wife in
I know the wiped feeling, because Gerry has sent me this uppercut of an e-mail: 'Hullo, Mr Robinson. I have just read your excellent book, Invasion 1940. One error in it. You stated that Bomber Command wireless operators tested their equipment before take-off. Not true. Radio silence was strictly maintained. How do I know? I was one.' Wham!
Gerry and I exchanged notes, and I found that he served on 75NZ Squadron, largely manned by Kiwis (although Gerry is English), and highly respected for its 'press on regardless' attitude. Not surprisingly, it was also known as 'the chop squadron' - in all of Bomber Command, it suffered the second-highest casualties. Bomber Command was a huge organisation and the question of radio silence is equally big. R.V.Jones, one of the most brilliant boffins in WW2, wrote that, in his experience, Bomber Command (and indeed USAAF) was 'appallingly indiscreet in its use of radio transmissions'. A lot of bombers, he says, flew with their I.F.F. (Identification Friend or Foe) transmitting, and German fighters detected this signal. And Max Hastings, in his book Bomber Command, wrote about the Luftwaffe's 'Tame Boar' operations in 1943, and said: 'The British discovered that the Germans could often predict a raid by monitoring wireless operators' signals from all over eastern England during the morning air test, and 100 Group began to broadcast fake test signals on days when Bomber Command was not operating, to confuse the issue.'
In the end, Gerry and I agreed that we were both right: on 75NZ Squadron, radio silence was total, but on other squadrons it was a different story. War is never a simple business. And finally some good news: hardbacks of my latest yarn, A Splendid Little War - published in January - have all sold out. To celebrate this success, publication of the paperback edition has been brought forward from January 2014 to November 2013. Whoopee!
My thanks to all who wrote.
Derek Robinson Previous Readers Write
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Readers Write #32 November 2013
Never quit: portrait of a wartime pilot,
Flying in a Lancaster (earplugs needed),
And Baggy Bletchley versus the mobile loo.
The makers of the film A Bridge Too Far, based on Cornelius Ryan's book about the paratroop assault on Arnhem, held a preview before general release. As they left, the audience were asked to write their opinions. Many said it was a good film but the story was farfetched. They simply didn't believe that the force sent to relieve the paras would have to cross so many bridges. Yet the story was true. Arnhem was a bridge too far for the Allied relief columns, and so the operation ended in failure.
Things happen in war that any writer would hesitate to invent. Take the career of Lewis Hodges. He was 21 in 1940 when his Hampden bomber raided Stettin, was damaged, and he made a forced-landing in Brittany. He and his gunner then walked across France to Marseilles, got arrested and jailed. Hodges escaped, stowed away on a cargo boat to Oran in West Africa, got arrested and was returned to Marseilles, where he escaped yet again, having used a potato to create official-looking stamps on a pass. He travelled by train and taxi to the Pyrenees and into Spain. This time customs officers arrested him. He spent five weeks in a prison camp before the British Embassy secured his release and he went via Gibraltar to Britain and rejoined his squadron. He'd been on the run for eight months. Asked what he'd missed most, he said: 'My pyjamas.' Thereafter, when flying on ops he always wore them under his uniform. He flew many ops.
A long spell of night raids on Germany earned him a place in a squadron supporting SOE operations in Europe flying Halifax bombers that dropped supplies and agents to resistance groups. It was a lonely and dangerous task, calling for a calm temperament and superb navigational skills. By 1943 (when he was 24) he commanded the squadron, now flying Lysanders and Hudsons, small enough to land in fields. He flew SOE ops until 1944 and then went to the Far East, where he commanded a special duties squadron, using Lysanders, Dakotas and long-range Liberators to support resistance groups inBurma, Thailand and Malaya. These sorties lasted up to 20 hours, often in monsoon conditions. He ended the war with a double DSO and a double DFC .
That's a brief account of the extraordinary wartime career of the man who eventually became Air Chief Marshal Sir LewisHodges, CBE, CB, KCB. His portrait hangs in the RAF Club, in Piccadilly, and next to it is a picture of the first bombers he flew, Hampdens, in a low-level raid over the North Sea. It's the original that Tony Cowland painted for the new cover of the MacLehose Press edition of Damned Good Show. Those three words are a fitting description of both Lewis Hodges and the painting.
Onwards. I hear
from John W., an old pal in
More transatlantic info comes from another good guy, Tibor, who is currently mentoring students of English at the University of Tampa in Florida. One of his class wrote a thoughtful critique on my output. "Robinson," he says, "calmly narrates the Goshawk attack on the Zeppelin and subsequent firefight without getting too popcorn and relentless. It all goes back to straight reportage", which he believes I do as well as Hemingway and maybe even slightly better. Well, I just tell the story and hope for the best.
Meanwhile, Garth in NYC,
who is also in the military fiction business, has achieved the ultimate in
research by actually flying in a
Click on a thumbnail to see a larger version.
Very impressive. You can see what a beautiful beast the Lanc was (and is). Garth reports that he could move around reasonably freely, "although clambering over the main spar that holds the wings on is a bit of a sod, so what it would have been like in full flying gear doesn't bear thinking about" - especially in pitch darkness. "The airframe creaks and groans and screams and shudders, and the noise produced by the four engines is simply unbearable", so passengers wore ear-protectors. In WW2, aircrew endured the deafening noise, breathed oxygen, flew at 20,000 feet in temperatures down to minus 60, and faced flak and nightfighters. Garth concludes: "My respect for the men of Bomber Command, already high, has now doubled."
Jumping from the Lanc to the
electronic age, Bob ("a devoted reader since Piece of Cake
in 1991") writes from somewhere in
Lastly, a couple of messages from the UK. Rob has read and re-read all my stuff again, "thanks to your latest publisher who has seen the light in the quality and stark depth in your writing. Like so many, I read and read again, and each time reveals another layer in your characters. Some live, many die, but the reader truly cares about each." Which leads him to wonder: what happened next to CH3 after Cake and to Barton after A Good Clean Fight? Fanny Barton's future is spelled out very briefly in the novel - he goes to Rhodesia and commands a pilot training base (which, personally, I don't think would satisfy him for long). I can only guess at CH3's future, but the hard fact is that six American pilots flew in the Battle of Britain and five were killed later in the war; so CH3's chances of survival were not good.
And Phil joins the club of
those who re-read Cake every two or three years, and says:
"Liking Skull and Kellaway more with each reading.... I receive a sort of
holistic notice as I approach Baggy Bletchley's testicular battle on the
portable toilet. I know what's happening, more or less what he's going
through, and I still laugh out loud at each reading." I have a
soft spot for old Baggy. He survived tha
My thanks to all who wrote.
Readers Write #33 January 2014
13 boots on the ceiling
Love conquers all,
and pooch scoffs predator.
It's been said (probably by me) that fighter pilots take
nothing seriously except flying. An email from Richard gives an example
of this truth which made even my old eyebrows twitch. Back in 1985, when
he was a schoolboy, Richard got invited to visit RAF Binbrook. 5 and 11
Squadrons flew Lightnings from Binbrook, and the Lightning was the supreme
British postwar fighter. Its twin
As it happens, The Times also
recommended it highly - they included A
Splendid Little War in their 'Books of the Year' for
2013. Which was nice.
My thanks to all who wrote.
Readers Write #34 March 2014
Throttling a Camel,
And bouncing-bomb Mosquitoes.
a remarkable coincidence. Just when Mark (“always been a
fan of your WW1 and WW2 books”) learned about my latest, A Splendid Little War,
he was clearing out the family house, his mother having passed away. He
knew that his great-uncle and godfather John had flown with the RFC/RAF
in WW1 because he’d bequeathed Mark his medals
- the DFC, the Western Front and Great War campaign awards,
plus “a curious thing: the Order of St. Stanislav with Swords”.
Mark had been told that John had flown a Bristol Fighter “in the
another regular fan, Steve, emailed me to say that in the early 1980s,
“as an impressionable teenager”, he’d read John Harris’s story The Interceptors, also based on the Intervention of 1919. Fast-forward thirty years and he saw a copy in an
Next, to Oz. Peter in
More from Oz. I heard from Shannon, now in
Back to the
My thanks to all who wrote. Derek Robinson
Readers Write #35 June 2014
The low-flying submarine,
Hairy bridges, and...
The Vulcan attack
on the airfield at
How far and how fast Splendid sailed on that day didn’t alter the
Vulcan achievement, but it made a difference to me. An author needs to
make only one big factual mistake and he’s lost the reader’s confidence. I
research my stuff very thoroughly, and it’s good to hear from Steve in
The locals called it
Readers Write #36 September 2014
Not all over by Christmas,
and a hop in a CamelHere’s a thought. Suppose MI6 had killed Adolf in the middle of World War Two. Would that have improved the Allies’ chances? Probably not. It would have made him a German martyr and removed the war’s worst decision-maker, the man who invaded Russia and, seven months later, declared war on America. Two colossal mistakes. There were other blunders. The best way to defeat Germany was by leaving Hitler in charge. The same might be said of Kaiser Wilhelm II, supreme commander of all German forces in WW1. Kaiser Bill was tenpence in the shilling (if you don’t understand that, ask your dad). He believed he was appointed by God and therefore saying something made it happen. In August 1914, just after war was declared, he told his troops: ‘You will be home before the leaves have fallen from the trees.’ When the leaves fell, his troops already knew that they faced a long, hard fight. Confidence in the Kaiser took a knock.
Readers Write #37 November 2014
death in the desert,
and the Tsar rides again.Here’s a surprise. Product placement has infiltrated the writing game. It’s been part of the Hollywood economy for many years - if your hero drinks beer, make sure he always has a bottle of Old Frothenslosh and the brewery will write you a fat cheque. Even fatter, if you you can get him to say he likes it because it’s old, stale, and has the head at the bottom, that being their slogan. Absurd? Look at what Popeye did for the sale of spinach. And now Land Rover has handed six figures to someone so that he’ll write a new Bond yarn about which I know nothing except it’s a safe bet that a Land Rover has a supporting role, and you can be sure it starts when Bond turns turns the key.
Readers Write #38 March 2015
Much angst in Op Bam,
Readers Write #39 May 2015
The crashes that never were,
the Fortress that tried to fly backwards,and Kaiser Bill's painful pranks.
Previous Readers Write.......................................................................................................................................................................................
Readers Write #40 July 2015
A shabby Cardigan,
Why Moggy buzzed Protheroe,and tiny gems in the Cake
We Brits are notorious for celebrating our defeats. Boadicea, famous for losing to the Romans. Harold, second-best to William the Conqueror.
Moving on. An interesting email from Jeff, somewhere in the
Drove my Chevy to the levee
but the levee was dry,
Them good ole boys were drinking
whisky and rye.
Now, I have seen a levee. Big American rivers have them. A levee is an embankment, built to keep the water out. The word is French; levee means ‘raised’. That’s why it’s dry. Go to a wet levee and the river will wash you away. The reason Don Maclean (who wrote the song) went to the levee was it rhymed with Chevy. If he meant it was dry in the non-alcoholic sense, how could them good ole boys be drinking whisky and rye? Nice melody, but the lyrics go nowhere. American Pie sold three million copies in a single year. When Maclean was asked its meaning, he said: ‘It means I never have to work again.’
You may be thinking that I pay too much attention to what words mean. Well, it’s my job. And I believe that sloppy writing means lazy thinking. Here’s an example. Recently a double-decker bus hit a bridge in
Readers Write #41 November 2015
The galloping submarine,
Skull's desert wear,and a left-handed Cake
As the lawyers like to say, the devil is in the detail. My advice to any new author is to read your contract very carefully and with a blue pencil in your hand. Publishers like to insert a clause that gives them a fat share of any sales of screen rights, meaning film or TV money. I always cross out that clause. Publishers are in the book business, not the movie business, and who knows? Screen rights could earn the author more than royalties. Writing is a job, and it’s up to the author to stay in business.
And the devil-in-the-detail warning applies to writing the book in the first place. Get one small detail wrong, and the reader is liable to shout ‘Idiot!’ and fling your book in the fire. For instance, in a crime novel by a well-known author, a character walks through an English wood at night and is startled by the sudden noise of an owl’s wings. Not true. Owls’ wings are virtually silent; that’s what helps them catch their prey. It was just a detail, but my belief in the whole story took a nasty knock. Another example: a book about the Falklands Campaign made such a cock-up of a British submarine’s journey that I calculated the sub must have been doing 125 m.p.h. That sort of thing shakes your faith. Well, I’m human too, and errors can creep in, so if possible I ask a former pilot to read my new aviation story while it’s still in typescript. Avoids a lot of blunders. Even so, I sometimes stumbled. Many years ago, a veteran pilot pointed out that a book of mine referred to an R.F.C. pilot returning from a patrol at low level and hedge-hopping over the trenches. ‘Wrong,’ he said. ‘There weren’t any hedges left to hop over.’ I hadn’t thought of that.
One thing I never had to worry about was what my aircrews wore on duty, since it had to be uniform. Now Steve in
‘His blazer was a size too large for Skull, and its stripes of dove grey, pillar-box red and royal blue, with gold piping, had faded to soft pastel shades, but its cool looseness was just the thing for the desert. Skull wore it with a pair of corduroy bags bought in
I never thought my ripping yarns would be linked with Philip Larkin. Oliver in Tamworth discovered AGCF (‘utterly brilliant’), moved on to Goshawk Squadron and wondered if Woolley’s remembering of the whole Aston Villa team in 1913 (when the club won the Football Association’s Cup) might have prompted Larkin to mention Aston Villa in his poem MCMXIV. Well, stranger things have happened, although personally I can’t imagine Larkin enjoying my stuff. Even his friends said he was glum (he turned down the offer of becoming Poet Laureate) and his output revealed a dour pessimism. Not much room for humour in Larkin’s spectrum of talent. Anyway, Oliver now has a chance to compare and contrast my style with Larkin’s - he has Piece of Cakeand Damned Good Show to occupy him in the long winter nights.
Across the pond, Paraag in
Previous Readers Write
Readers Write #42 Jamuary 2016
Trust nobody, that's my motto,
with a gong for Gunnar
and rocket-firing long before the Typhoons.
People sometimes ask me why I don’t write plays or movie scripts, seeing as I have something of a gift for dialogue. (It wasn’t a total gift. I worked on it for many years, writing everything from radio commercials to magazine articles. I churned out two disastrous and unpublishable novels, which at least showed me how not to write. Goshawk Squadron was one of those overnight successes that had twenty years’ apprenticeship behind it.)
thousand miles away (or more) is Eric Driver, in
artwork on the side is taken from an Italian painting entitled ‘The Sleeping
Venus’. (The Russians liked to show off their artistic skills.) Those
rockets are an authentic detail. Nieuport 16s had them as early as 1916,
and when Zeppelins began raiding
news from Oliver in
Finally, a literary ricochet. Mike, who is in the
Readers Write #43 May 2016
The hazards of fiction,
‘Why 1914?’ rides again,and a big polar bear in
Years ago I was the defendant in a case of breach of copyright - what’s usually called plagiarism - after I published my novel, Piece of Cake. It’s an occupational hazard. As someone said to me during the filming, ‘After the hit, comes the writ.’ In my case, it came after a national paper announced that Cake would be adapted for television and the budget was £6 million. Some people thought that I would get it all. If only. One person decided I didn’t deserve any of it because, he claimed, I’d copied his book. (Later I discovered that he had written two screenplays about an RAF fighter squadron in WW2 and he’d failed to sell them, which may explain his resentment.) Thanks to the support of my publishers and some top lawyers, I won the case, but it took seven years.
thing I remember is that in the seventh year, the plaintiff
commissioned a barrister to write a Counsel’s Opinion.
Mysteriously, I got to see it. Their barrister advised them
not to take the case to court, and wrote: ‘Mr Robinson
appears to be a tenacious opponent.’ Too right I
was. One of the accusations made against me was that I pinched
the use of the pilots’ nicknames, in particular Moggy Cattermole,
from the plaintiff’s book. In fact I knew the original Moggy when
I was at school. That, of course, was 40 years ago, but I tracked him
down. He lived in
So what? It was a long time ago, and Cake is
still in print. (In fact, Quercus will reprint all my RFC/RAF
novels next month.) But tenacity is, I think, an underrated quality in
writers. Talent is not enough. The
Today there are Jane Austen Festivals. TV and the cinema can’t get enough of her; the latest
Emails regularly remind me that I should be grateful for the English language, which is both marvellously flexible and gratifyingly universal, and not just in the English-speaking world. In a recent RW, I celebrated Gunnar, a retired log-truck driver in Sweden who has read everything I’ve written; and now I’ve heard from Lars in Denmark who, when serving with UN forces in Cyprus, ‘stumbled upon Piece of Cake and have been a huge fan of yours ever since. Your books (of which I have every one) give me great joy and laughs and thrills. Besides, the books keep me in touch with the English language. I have just re-read the two books with pilot Silk for the third time, and will certainly read them again. You are the best.’ And Lars ends with a request: ‘Please tell me that more books are under way!’
As it happens, I’ve just finished another novel. Not a flying story; more like The Eldorado Network. Every novel is a gamble, and I’m too close to this one to know whether it’s any good. Watch this space.
Lars bought a copy of Why 1914?
Other requests for copies keep arriving, which suggests to me
that the tsunami of books, TV programmes, articles and memoirs has
prompted people to wonder what caused the whole catastrophe.
That’s the question my book tries to answer, and I packed it with
things that most people (including me) never learned at school.
Here’s an example. Nearly everyone has heard about the
assassination on 28 June 1914 of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at
‘Franz Ferdinand went to
Dave Morris, curator of the museum, says of the rockets: ‘They would be launched just like fireworks. There was a button in the cockpit that would fire them all at once and they would hope that at least one would hit the balloon.’ Le Prieur rockets were cardboard tubes filled with 200g of black powder, with a wooden conical head and a tail. Pilots got as close as possible to the target to make up for the rockets’ extreme inaccuracy. Eric tells me the rockets were set off by a 2-volt battery - ‘presumably that was the norm in those days’. He’s trying to work out how he can fire his Nieuport 16’s rockets without upsetting the Civil Aviation people at the next Classic Fighters Airshow at Easter 1917. ‘If it comes off, I’ll let you know; if it doesn’t then I won’t...’A last word about names. American authors go in for three names - think of Edgar Allan Poe. Maybe I’ve been shortchanging myself. Is it too late to adopt a longer name? I’m thinking of Miles Farragut Ravensworth. The legal process is surprisingly simple. The UK Deed Poll Service will rename you, in only four working days, for a mere £33. One man changed his name to Bacon Double Cheeseburger. A father and son took the name of their favourite football club, Queens Park Rangers. Someone decided to be called Happy Birthday. Another went for Sarge Metal-fatigue. No. On reflection, I’ll stick to what I’ve got. It’s easier for autographs.
Readers Write #44 June 2016
Play dead and don't smile,
Operation Jostle was no picnic,
and the work ethic of Dylan Thomas.Cops-and-robbers dramas on television often claim to reflect real life. Sometimes the phrase ‘police procedurals’ suggests serious authenticity. Yet the programme makers can be surprisingly squeamish. When murder is committed, the corpse is not dead, of course. It is an actor trying not to breathe. What is odd is that the actor’s mouth is always shut. On television, everyone dies with the lips firmly sealed.
This is such an unbreakable rule that I asked a friendly medic about it, a man who has seen plenty of sudden death. ‘Not true,’ he told me. ‘Most people die with their mouths open.’ Murder on TV or in the cinema is lavish with blood spatter but the victim always dies with a presentable expression. This is one of the many curiosities of cop shows. Mobile phones are useful in keeping the plot moving, but they rarely ring when anyone’s talking. Come to that, nobody enters a room in the middle of dialogue; they always arrive when someone’s finished speaking. Cops never fail to kick down doors with ease; building codes on film sets are pathetic. How often have I seen a cop go into a men’s room and express his frustration by ripping down a hand-dryer? I hope one day to see him dislocate his wrist because the device is securely bolted to the wall. And one day a police car will race to the scene of the crime and find nowhere to park. It happens to the rest of us. Why not them?
The answer, of course, is entertainment. In the world of televised drama there is always a parking space; otherwise the show would never end. I too am in the entertainment business. Readers spend good money to buy a novel because they expect it to entertain them; if it’s not readable it’s unreadable. But it has to be believable too, and that can be tricky. I understand why murder victims in TV dramas keep their mouths shut; the director doesn’t want them to look unacceptably dead. But whenever I see the alleged body, mouth firmly shut, my reaction is to say: ‘It’s an actor!’ And realism goes out of the window.
So it’s a balancing act. Film and TV directors want to be convincing but not so convincing that the viewer turns pale and heads for the exit. Years ago, I had a letter from a very senior RAF officer, written more in sadness than in anger, who deplored the savagery with which pilots are killed in Piece of Cake. He accepted that aircrew died, but why did I have to spell out the brutal horror of their deaths? (Perhaps he feared the novel would harm recruiting.) Well, I wrote Cake because I felt that a lot of fiction about air combat had pulled its punches. It made too much of the chivalry of the skies (which I doubted) and not enough of the reality of death. A pilot who is cut in half by a burst of cannon shells at twenty thousand feet is no more romantic than an infantryman shot through the head. Courage in air warfare is a matter of recognising the price of failure. Pilots know this, and many of them have told me that Cake (and my other RFC/RAF novels) rings true.
sometimes my stuff prompts a reader to write a book. Margaret, somewhere in the
last RW, a few literary oddities have cropped up. For instance:
Dylan Thomas was not a no-good boyo who wrote best when tanked-up. His
village GP from 1949 to 1953, Dr Hughes, wrote a memoir of this much-loved
British poet, and in it several myths go up in flames. Thomas wrote
best, his doctor says, in conditions of ‘quiet, routine and relative
sobriety’. The routine never varied: he worked in a shed,
undisturbed, from 2.30 pm until 6.30 pm. His wife, Caitlin, was ‘a nymphomaniac
and first-class bitch’. Their rows were vicious: ‘She would
physically attack Thomas, sometimes knocking him unconscious by banging his
head on the floor.’ He died, not from drinking 18 straight whiskeys in a
a comfortable chair always helps, and someone recently paid $394,000 for
the chair that J.K.Rowling sat in while writing Harry Potter. Whether
the bestselling skills go with the furniture is open to question.
Saul Bellow’s desk failed to get a bidder when it came up for auction.
Nobody wanted to own the woodwork on which he won a Nobel. I’d have
offered a fiver. Saul was a Booker Prize judge in 1971. He wanted Goshawk
Squadron to win but he got voted down by the others, one of
whom later admitted he was drunk. Life is full of oddities.
Finally, something to revel in: a Spitfire in flight, so close and so clear you feel you can reach out and touch it.
John Dibbs is an aviation photographer. Working with ex-RAF pilot Tim Ellison, he got within 15 feet of a Spitfire in flight. By shooting through an open canopy with a hand-held camera, he captured these remarkable images. Usually, close-ups of the fighter in the air meant using zoom lenses, followed by much cropping and magnification. John Dibbs got closer than any photographer I’ve ever known.
Dibbs has tracked down every Spitfire in the world that’s flying and photographed them all, brilliantly. They total fifty - far more than I thought possible; but, amazingly, several of them were total wrecks that have been restored and made flyable - a tribute to the Spitfire’s design.
Readers Write #45 September 2016Luck, good and bad,
Eye-opener in Fiji,
And another blunder for the hit list.
sometimes thought of writing a book about the influence of luck on
war. Paddy Ashdown (who was in the SAS) once said: “The
first casualty of war is not the truth. It’s the plan.”
Given the violence of combat and the way it can make nonsense of
detailed plans, it’s likely that some of these unforeseen casualties
will be labelled as good luck by one side and bad luck by their
enemy. Sometimes what looks like luck turns out to change the
course of war.
Then there was the
Lastly, a little-known fact about the 9/11 terrorist attack on the
There’s a lot of luck in publishing too, and Shannon (now living in
One of the surprises of writing is the discovery that a book has travelled far and influenced lives. Another reader in America, J.P.M. in Connecticut (“Have been a fan for decades”) ordered copies of A Good Clean Fight, Operation Bamboozle and Why 1914? “Keep on writing,” he urged. And Kieran in Buckinghamshire emailed me: “I have just read Goshawk Squadron after more than 20 years and enjoyed it even more this time around... your books recreate the merciless, raw and terrifying experience those young men went through better than anyone else, in my opinion. And they are hugely entertaining!” And he too ordered a copy of Why 1914?. Which made me wonder why there is ongoing interest in this short (200 pages) book. Maybe it’s because the torrent of thick volumes on the Great War have stimulated a question that they failed to answer. Why did the catastrophe happen?
At the start of Why 1914? I quoted what Liddell Hart, a respected military historian, wrote in 1930. His History of the World War said: “Fifty years were spent in the process of making
more on my hit list of blunders by TV and movie directors. In the
last RW, I condemned the practice of filming corpses with
their mouths firmly shut, and of cops who get into a house with a
single painless kick. (In one of Raymond Chandler’s books,
his private eye Philip Marlowe tries to kick a locked door in, and
fails. “I should have known better,” Marlowe said. “The
front door is about the only part of a
Last word: I’ve finished another novel. It’s called Holy Smoke and it’s a heartwarming comedy of deceit, deception, power-seeking and revenge set in the liberated
Readers Write #46 November 2016Bats in the bomb bay,
crashed in the bush,
and Garbo in jail (maybe).
may be stranger than fiction, but writers like me learn to handle it
carefully. Something can be totally true and yet unbelievable to
the punter. Bizarre things happened in WW2, for instance. One
I came across them when I was researching my new novel, Holy Smoke (out next year). It involves the wartime American intelligence service, the
discovered that you could freeze a bat and then thaw it again with no
evident harm to the bat. Leaping from this to the fact that many
Japanese buildings were made of paper, some scientist came up with a
foolproof idea. Freeze a bunch of bats, wire tiny incendiary
devices to their feet, and drop them from a high-altitude plane. “Bats
away!” As they fell through the warming atmosphere they would
revive and, with the gimcrack buildings of
This loony project was put to the test at an
It seems there is no limit to what some people will believe. In WW1, large numbers of sober, intelligent English folk believed that a Russian army had been rushed across England by train, the proof being that someone had identified them by ‘the snow on their boots’. People today still believe in ‘the Angel of Mons’, a supposedly divine apparition that allegedly saved the British army during its retreat in 1914. If you want the truth about these (and other) myths, read my narrative history, Why 1914? Only £8 post-paid in the
So did Liam in
Soon afterward, Flight Sergeant Colin Duncan arrived from
Liam has read my Desert Air Force story A Good Clean Fight, and he writes: “Your description of the heat, the isolation and the stench of the pilots in
From Oz to
Not all my stuff is about aircraft, and Steve in
Last word: I urge movie directors to stop making an actor take his hat off at a moment of high drama. If it’s meant to indicate how surprised the guy is, it fails. I saw a film about Krakatoa. Local fisherman were on the island when the volcano exploded, and one immediately took his hat off. Not a wise move when lumps of hot lava were falling all around him.
Readers Write #47 January 2017
books as big as bricks.
Let’s start with a test. Here’s your question: Which nation was
But from 1941 to 1944,
It might be said that Japanese leaders were suffering from wishful thinking. There is a lot of that stuff in war. In 1941, when Air Ministry planners assumed that RAF Bomber Command’s raids would panic the German public; in 1941, when Hitler ordered the invasion of Russia without winter clothing; in 1942, when Mussolini shipped his white horse to North Africa in readiness for a victory parade in Cairo; in late 1944, when U.S. generals assumed that the German army was no longer capable of an offensive, only to be hit by the Battle of the Bulge - all were guilty of wishful thinking.
Enough of that. From the sublime to the gorblimey... The new novel, Holy Smoke,
is now being prepared for the printer. With luck, copies will be
available in a couple of months - watch this
space. (If you wish to book a copy, email me on email@example.com).
Meanwhile, encouraging messages arrive from readers. It’s always
good to hear from a fellow-author, and Tony Park writes from
Moving on: here’s a caveat. Novels are a matter of taste, like fruit: I like apples, you like pears. It’s always dangerous to recommend a novel; the other person may find it unreadable. No book is for everybody. OK, now that we’ve cleared the decks, here comes a broadside. I find that many of the current batch of novels are unreadable. Often I go back to re-reading novelists who may be dead but were fine craftsmen when they lived. Many contemporary authors haven’t taken time to learn their craft, and too many of them seem to feel that a novel that’s 600 pages long must be twice as good as one that calls a halt at 300 pages; what’s more, it’s even better if it hits 700 or 800. Drop a book like that and you could break a toe. It’s especially dangerous with thrillers, action stories, detective fiction, where what is essential is pace. I’ve just dumped a 623-page whodunnit - highly praised by the quality press on three continents - because its pace was so sluggish that by page 119 I was struck down with narcolepsy and the tome slid from my nerveless fingers. Also the plot had more holes than Swiss cheese. It was written by one of those authors who can’t pick up a phone without telling us that he put it down again. Don’t publishers have editors any more? That novel cried out for a bucket of red ink.
By contrast, here’s some good news. Dogs are smarter than we are. Tony, an old friend of mine, told me about his boyhood days in
Lastly, here’s a couple of oddities I found in my research. (1) When the German army planned the
Readers Write #48 April 2017
and the Mystery of the Bone-dry Brolly
War, of course, is a great creator of fake news. A
reporter on a quality newspaper once asked my opinion on a story he’d
come across, about an RAF pilot in WW2 who allegedly stole a Hurricane
fighter and flew it to a Luftwaffe airfield in
Often time is a factor; for newspapers, tomorrow is too late. But journalists can be sloppy. I
was the defendant in a longrunning lawsuit when the Sunday Times ran a
big piece, with colour photographs, about the plaintiff’s having to
sell her late husband’s medals in order to finance the action. No
mention of the fact that she had the benefit of Legal Aid, so there
were no legal bills for her to pay. The reporter missed a trick there. (Eventually, I won the case; no mention of that in the Sunday Times, either.) So much for junk. But, once in a while, the truth comes out, and newspapers get it right. Take the story of the umbrella man in
The man put up his umbrella as the motorcade was passing. Why? It was a clear, dry day. Was it a signal to the gunman? The umbrella man must be a suspect. Nobody could trace him. That looked bad, too. Then,
15 years later, somebody did. The truth came out. The umbrella was a
political gesture, meant to remind Jack Kennedy that his father, when
he was ambassador to
Another joke was the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) at the outbreak of WW2. SIS operated agents in
Onwards. It’s always a pleasure to hear from a feminine fan, and Meredith in
Aircraft cockpits in WW1 had no purpose-built furniture; cane chairs for the pilot were lightweight, simple and cheap. Also handy in a two-seater for swapping cockpits in mid-air, one of the batty ways aircrews amused themselves.
Another longtime fan is Adam in
A larger photo and more details at: http://www.navalaviationmuseum.org/attractions/aircraft-exhibits/item/?item=bfc-2_goshawk
Readers Write #49 May 2017
Hello Hitler, goodbye Britain?
the SE5a flies again,
and the glider-bomb is late again.
thinking leads to bad writing, just as lazy writing points to a
bungalow mentality: nothing upstairs. There are world leaders who
sometimes rush into print and reveal that their ability to handle words
is that of a not-too-bright ten-year-old. Churchill had greater
respect for the English language. After the British army’s escape
weasel-words there. No spin-doctoring. Churchill did not
say - as so many politicians instinctively
do - “We must address the issue.” (Which means
nothing at all.) He told the truth. We could do with
politicians today who tell us, not what they think we want to hear, but
the hard truth, no matter how unpleasant. Back in 1940, the grim
prospect was Hitler’s plan to destroy a free and independent
Anyone who still thinks invasion was just one of Hitler’s daydreams
should read SS General Schellenberg’s Invasion Plan. Recently,
the BBC showed a television drama called SS-GB (about a German-occupied
is a relief to turn to Operation Sealion, codename for Hitler’s planned
invasion, and read that it was to be ‘a surprise crossing’ of the
Channel. The reality was that, by the time his invasion fleet was ready
to sail, there was no possible surprise. The Royal Navy was ready to
smash and sink the slow armada of river barges. (My Invasion 1940 gives
full details.) To pretend that it could be a surprise
crossing was lazy thinking. Hitler had a fatal habit of believing
that by saying something, he made it happen. He sent his troops to
Which brings me to Nick Garton’s new book on the WW1 fighter, the SE5 and its many variants. This book is the reverse of sloppy. It’s a hardback, 160 pages, superbly illustrated (many in colour), brilliantly researched and written with the utmost clarity. Here’s a taste of the pix:
Nick tells us everything about the design, building and combat flying
of the SE5, including many things you would never imagine. Its airframe
was wood - Douglas fir and
And - surprise, surprise - there’s an interview with me, all about Goshawk Squadron, which Nick says inspired his book and ‘was a novel that changed popular perceptions about World War One for good’. He quotes my reason for equipping the squadron with the SE5a rather than the Sopwith Camel. It was ‘the same reason that Woolley gives in the book: it was a compromise that was most effective in accomplishing the purpose of the pilots being up there, namely to kill the enemy’. As for the man himself, Nick writes: ‘Then there is the magnetic appeal of Woolley, Robinson’s uncompromising, Guinness-swilling anti-hero, drawn with significant influence from two former ‘camp rats’ who rose to lead SE5a squadrons: Mannock and McCudden.’
Nick’s book is priced at £25. It’s published in
Meanwhile, emails keep arriving from all over. Lars in Denmark was with UN forces in Cyprus and ‘stumbled upon Piece of Cake and have been a huge fan of yours ever since...Just read the two books with pilot Silk for the third time and will certainly read them again...’ Alan in Maryland, USA, writes: ‘I have no doubt whatsoever your existing books are going to delight readers for decades, and perhaps even centuries, to come.’ It’s an encouraging thought. Most art is of its time. Things date quickly. If any of my books is still in print 50 years from now, I’ll look down (or up) and hope they’ve spelt my name correctly. Alan adds: ‘Books like yours are not just adventure stories and not just interesting historical records; they are appreciations of people who risked and often sacrificed their lives for the good of humanity.’ I can’t argue with that.
Lastly, an email from
Readers Write #50 July 2017
the secret chequebook,
and three forgotten heroes.
Readers Write #51 August 2017
Bang! You're dead.
Sometimes the job of the novelist is to think the unthinkable. Years ago, I wrote Hullo
those days, atom bombs would be delivered by aircraft, and the
Vulcan was the ultimate bomber - a
four-engined, delta-shape masterpiece that flew fast and high and
handled like a fighter. But there were three problems. One
was the obvious (but unspoken) fact that any Vulcan crew sent to
retaliate would never return, because the
official answer to that scenario was that an impetuous action could not
happen because any nuclear strike would be preceded by a State of
“Therefore it follows than an intelligent maniac would strike when there is no diplomatic crisis? No S.M.I.T.? A bolt from the blue?”
“Why would he do that?” Freddy asked.
“Silly question,” Silk said. “He’s a maniac. He can do what he likes.”
“World leaders aren’t maniacs,” Skull said. “Nuclear war kills everyone.”
“Maniacs don’t think they’re maniacs,” Silk said. “Maniacs believe they’re doing God’s work.”
course, times have changed since the days of Vulcans. The great
advantage of manned bombers was that they could be recalled. Now
we have missiles. In all the bluster of Trump and Kim Jong-un, it
is worth remembering the only other occasion when the superpowers
verged on full-scale nuclear war: the week beginning 22 October
1962. Nikita Kruschkev had loaded
LeMay had often talked of annihilating the Soviet Union, and he believed that
It’s worth spelling out what nuclear oblivion meant in 1962. The American arsenal that made
A nuclear crisis is not a poker game. Curtis LeMay planned to play poker with
A Soviet submarine flotilla was in the area. The U.S.Navy was
aware of their presence and had been troubling them with small depth
charges. What the Navy did not know was that the submarines were
armed with nuclear torpedoes. The Navy’s harassment persuaded
some of the Soviet officers to believe that war had started, and
they voted to launch their torpedoes. Fortunately, their
commander, Captain Arkhipov, an experienced man, decided to wait and
see. Arkhipov was the Soviet equivalent of President Kennedy. If
the nuclear weapons in
In the Napoleonic Wars, General Wellington urged his officers always to try to know what was on the other side of the hill - in other words, what the enemy was thinking and planning. General LeMay had no time for that, and many other American generals and admirals agreed with him. He knew only one action. When the Cuban missile crisis was over, he was furious. “We lost!” he said. “We ought to just go in there today and knock 'em off.”
I have a lot of friends in
******Finally, it is a relief to turn to the relative sanity of Readers Write. David, in
Readers Write #52 Sept 2017
Beefeaters and ballyhoo,
my life as a travelling blacksmith,
and me and Bill Gates.
Here’s a question. How would you like to have the International Socrates
Award? You don’t speak Greek? Okay, you want to have the Manager of
the Year Award? Or get the Queen Victoria Commemorative Award? Or the
Best Cities Award? Or join the International Club of Leaders?
Listen, you deserve it. A man of your skills and achievements needs an
Look, don’t thank me, and certainly don’t try
to thank the
Many of the recipients came from
developing countries, places where you can often buy credentials for
cash. If they think the awards are from
It all began in 1971. In that year’s Booker Prize I came second, or so Saul Bellow, one of the judges, said. No money for me, of course, but I was briefly a minor celeb, and suddenly the International Biographical Centre (IBC), based in Cambridge, wanted to include me in their International Who’s Who in Poetry. Two problems: the book cost £18, which I didn’t have, and I hadn’t written a line of poetry.
Their entry form was a bit of a
challenge, too. My education lacked the sparkle that you expect a
top international poet to have, so I spiced it up with a spell at the
IBC printed the lot. Now I was a registered poet. I scraped together a fiver and bought their Certificate of Merit (‘For Distinguished Contributions to Poetry’) and hung it in the loo where it covered the damp patch and impressed the hell out of visitors. And it spawned a steady supply of letters from other publishers, all keen to celebrate my expanding celebrity. (Maybe they swap mailing lists.)
IBC wanted me for their book Men of Achievement. Debrett’s urged me to be included in People of Today, Burke’s Peerage liked me for World Book of Robinsons, and the American Biographical Institute reckoned I was ripe for their Personality of the Year, and - flatteringly - Great Minds of the 21st Century.
All those wonderful people had one thing in common. They wanted money, usually at a special saving. I could get into Debrett’s People of Today for a very reasonable £99. A place in Men of Achievement would set me back £75 or, with my name on the de luxe cover, £295. Rubbing shoulders with Great Minds of the 21st Century meant coughing up $395 for the book, which would give details of ‘how your great mind has worked to influence and pave the way for many individuals’. Or I could order the Great Minds Medal, ‘finished in a radiant golden tone’, at only $595.
The mail kept coming, year after year. Some I binned. Some got the Walter Mitty treatment. My employment record flowered: I had been a roustabout, crop-duster, bit-part actor, plumber’s mate, football referee, bartender and demolition worker. Under ‘Creative Works’ I listed five novels, one each in French, Dutch, Swedish, Spanish and Greek. For ‘Honours’, I created the eminent Theta Phi Omega award. If it doesn’t exist, then it ought to, and I deserved it as much as the next poet. Or non-poet.
No publisher ever questioned my claims. Several reference books listed them. Nobody quizzed me about my career as a private secretary to Lord Lucan. I even told them I was an expert in literary fraud, and no eyebrows were raised. Finally, I almost bought a book from Baron’s, a highpowered American business publisher. They offered me a full page in The Baron’s 500: Leaders for the New Century, with a portrait photograph; and to make me salivate they sent a sample page. It showed a smiling Bill Gates. Hey! Bill and I were two of 500 leaders taking the world into the 21st century!
Me and BIll: a dream team. Just one hitch. Baron’s wanted $895 in advance. No cash, no book. Another great idea got the chop, and world leaders were the poorer by one. They’ll be sorry.
Meanwhile, in the real world, copies of Holy
Smoke have been flying to all corners. (A few are left. When
they’re gone, they’re gone.) Books have gone to readers in
Not surprisingly, most orders are from within the
Readers Write #53
and Runaway Balloons
This isn’t so much about Readers Write as about Author’s Slant on war and its peculiarities. If that doesn’t interest you, move on.
Hitler spoofs are a brilliant idea. Someone took a scene from The Last Days of Hitler and changed the subtitles. Instead of raging at his generals, Hitler savages a local problem - the latest spoof has him blasting the bus service in my home town. Very funny, very professionally made, and it cost peanuts. Hitler becomes the voice of democracy. Nice twist.
Surprise is the key to this spoof. Suddenly a horror story is inverted and it
becomes a joke. Which is fine as long as we don’t forget the
horror. Hitler was a monster who brought death to millions. He
gambled with the future of
That was the time of the
That snippet of information has never, to my knowledge, appeared in the histories of the period. Nor has the opinion of Ulrich Steinhilper, one of the few Luftwaffe pilots who were sent to the Czech border at that time and who survived the war. He has rejected the historians who claim the German threat was real and Czech resistance was pointless. “We were just a hotch-potch of personnel of very varied experience and training,” he wrote in his memoirs, Spitfire On My Tail, “in aircraft which either belonged in a museum or weren’t armed anyway.” He made no mention of the Soviet aircraft in
There is a lot of bluffing in world politics, and in some cases men are bluffing themselves. The Vietnam war would never have begun if President
Eisenhower hadn’t made a speech about the ‘domino theory’. This was the belief that if Vietnam went communist, then all of south-east Asia
would be lost, even the Philippines and maybe Australia or India. Kennedy inherited the domino theory. (American government knew almost
nothing about that part of the world because all its experts were fired during the McCarthy witch-hunt.)
Cold War had persuaded
bluff was based on force, of which he had enough to frighten people. One of the
great what-ifs of history revolves around the timing of his V1 and V2 assault
It shows the
firing lines planned by the Germans from launch sites across the north of
A gloomy thought. To end with I’ve found a couple of WW2 believe-it-or nots that I came across recently.
Fairey Swordfish was a slow but tough biplane that the Fleet Air Arm inherited
at the start of WW2. It cruised at 80 knots, so it was useful as a carrier
plane, and also as a torpedo bomber. A Swordfish attack sank a large part
of the Italian fleet in
Swordfish carried torpedoes or bombs, and towards the end of the war they were fitted with rocket projectiles. One even sank a U-boat with them. The plane’s nickname was ‘Stringbag’, after the housewives’ shopping bag, because so many armaments could be stowed aboard it. The Swordfish was the only biplane to fly on ops throughout the war. American flyers couldn’t take it seriously. One asked: “Where did that come from?” A British officer said, “Fairey’s.” The American said: “That figures.”
Finally the humble barrage balloon, fleets of which flew above British cities
like silvery whales. They frightened German bombers into flying higher,
where their bomb-aiming was less accurate. There was a problem.
Strong winds might snap their cables which, dragged across country, could do
damage. Somebody had a bright idea. When the wind was right,
barrage balloons with long cables were released. They drifted
Readers Write #54 December 2017
Slow Burners,and 21 million jerrycans.
Stick your neck out and people will try to chop it off. It happened to me. I knew when I wrote Goshawk Squadron that
the book would draw blood, and when the Society of RFC Veterans
denounced it, I wasn’t surprised. Then Alan Gibson reviewed it on
BBC Radio and he summed up its central character, Stanley Woolley, in a
four-letter word that is one of the few curse words which, even today,
is never heard on the air. Well, Gibson won a first in history at
No book is for everybody. The reader has bought it; he’s entitled to hate it. But Gibson blundered when he called Woolley a ****. Goshawk Squadron is still in print, almost 50 years later. Half a dozen different publishers have taken it on, and it’s been translated a few times. That doesn’t happen to a story about a ****, a character who by definition is stupid, selfish and unsuccessful. Woolley is none of those. He rubs people up the wrong way in order to teach them a lesson that might, just might, save their lives. He knows what works.
Do brothels have doormen? He sounded very confident. Maybe he knew more about the subject than I did.
His message hangs on the wall as a reminder that, whilst some readers can’t wait for my next book, others chuck it at the cat. A reader wrote to say that, after a chapter or two, A Good Clean Fight bored him rigid. Maybe he expected aircraft and what he got was soldiers. (The airmen arrived later.) After a couple of years, he wrote again to say he’d given it a second chance and was gripped. Same story, different frame of mind. I just write the book. Sometimes it’s a square peg that gets read by a round hole. Life is a gamble.
Now David, an old pal living in
Which takes us to the heart of the story. Holy Smoke doesn’t start with a bang because it’s about a shadow of a man, a nobody, a jobless yesterday. But he never gives up and life has dealt him a hand with one ace. It turns out to be a joker. He plays his ace, and by great good luck it makes a little money. Then - unknown to him - it grows into a huge swindle that leaves an American intelligence agency with egg on its face.. The novel is based on fact. (I have the paperwork.) It’s a slow burner, which explains the opening. Sometimes I think it would do no harm if everyone in the CIA, MI6 and whatever the KGB is now called were to read Holy Ghost. Even a nobody can make them look foolish.
Time for a picture. Here’s a rare photograph of the German retreat after D-Day.
The vehicle is a military wagon, towed by horses and camouflaged with
foliage against rocket attacks by Typhoon fighter-bombers. In
For the invasion of
Lastly, an email from Dave in
“ It strikes me that most writers would have been bogged down by the narrative...Instead, you’ve kept the events as obscured as they would have been for the participants...You’ve woven the characters beautifully. They face each day, each event as it comes...Events such as Eagle Day (when the Luftwaffe launched its assault on England) aren’t signposted as such; they’re just especially hard days at the office... It would have been so easy to get bogged down with hindsight and the big-picture view. I’m very glad you didn’t.”
Me, too, Dave. One of the great strengths of the novel is that it can take the reader to places he would otherwise never go. Cake puts him in the cockpit and let's him see what happens. Often it's not what he - or the reader - expected.
Readers Write #55 January 2018
Woolley rings bells,
there’s nowt so queer as folk,
and Hornet’s Sting rides again.
My first novel featured the SE5a biplane, After that, I worked my way through the Sopwith Camel, the Bristol Fighter, the Hurricane, the Tomahawk, the Hampden, the Wellington, and eventually the Avro Vulcan - all of which are now museum pieces, if they survive at all. So it’s good to hear from a pilot who has read my stuff and has known the trials of military flying at first hand. Since he’s a serving officer, I’ll call him Peter (not his real name). Operational security, he tells me, is the flavour of the month.
Peter tells me he “first encountered Piece of Cake via the TV series when he was still at primary school.” He next came across the book at the age of 18, when he joined the University Air Squadron. He recalls: “Reading Piece of Cake for the first time as an adult was a game-changer for me, and immediately I bought the sequel (A Good Clean Fight) and your RFC trilogy, which I also loved.” He flew with the Fleet Air Arm. Fast-forward a few years. Now he’s still flying but he has a son and they’re both deep in aviation history. He says: “A large part of that is due to the influence of your writing... Please accept my sincere gratitude for your thorough historical research combined with your incredible flair for storytelling, and for writing things the way they were rather than the way many people think they were.”
Peter has sometimes been at the sharp end of military aviation and he knows the symptoms. He writes: “I was intrigued by Woolley in the RFC trilogy - the fact that he ends one book (Hornet’s Sting) as a level-headed, approachable good egg, and then begins the next book (Goshawk Squadron) as a complete bastard. I liked this transition - particularly that there isn’t any obvious and telegraphed reason why - because it is a fascinating and realistic depiction of a man suffering from the effects of real fatigue and stress, and the reader needs to work that out for himself. Whilst the reasons why have changed over the years, the symptoms are exactly the same and we occasionally still see those transitions in aviation today - although thankfully for us the understanding and care provided in the industry in this day and age have come on leaps and bounds.”
on. One of the problems of writing fiction is that some readers
think a character is unbelievable while, in real life, people are
even weirder. I’ve been looking back at previous editions of
Readers Write, and examples sprang out. There was Stephen, reading Goshawk Squadron in
front of a log fire until the early hours, when he nodded off,
“When I awoke, a puppy had eaten the last pages.” People have
been known to steal my books. One man read Hornet’s Sting
in the bath, dropped it and all the pages stuck together. Jim was
so obsessed with my RFC quartet that his wife gave him a flight in a
Sopwith Camel for his 50th birthday. A chap in
And various people have told me that my stuff helped them survive being in the army, or fighting in
Time for a picture. Here’s a clue: it’s 100 octane, and don’t light a match near it.
I used to get a bit of flak, mainly from the top brass, about the amount of alcohol drunk by pilots in the RFC quartet. Especially in Hornet’s Sting. When you look at the cover illustration - Bristol Fighters battling with a thunderstorm, painted by the brilliant Anthony Cowland - you get a taste of the everyday dangers that those aircrew faced. Patrols were hazardous, with or without the enemy, and a pilot’s life might be short. While it lasted, it was celebrated for all it was worth. In the book (it’s on page 136 of the paperback), Cleve-Cutler, the CO, knows how to revive the squadron on special occasions, whether good or bad:
“He let whim and inspiration guide him as he emptied bottles
into a galvanised hipbath. Brandy and champagne were a good
base, followed by port, gin, apple juice, fresh ground pepper,
more champagne, a couple of bottles of Guinness, some rum,
a blast of soda water for fizz, a splash of Benedictine for good luck.”
That was just the beginning. If you want to know what the results might look like, see above.
Garth, an old pal in
Just time for another picture.
Curtiss built fifteen thousand of these Warhawks in World War Two, and supplied them to 28 nations. In
A footnote from
and Charles Dash’s magic moment
“And then my body, like a cathedral, broke out into ringing. The hunchback in the belfry
had jumped and was swinging madly on the rope.”
If you find that hard to imagine, try this:
“Her hands were all over me, four hands it seemed, or more than four, and as she touched
me she made me weightless, lifting me off the table in a prolonged rite of levitation.”
Later, when things got steamy, she urged him: “Pray, pray at my portal.” As euphemisms go, portal wins the wooden spoon. Perhaps the wooden ladle. (And it wasn’t the worst entry.) I keep a file of advertisements that amused the reader for all the wrong reasons. In one ad, the makers of a vacuum cleaner claimed: Nothing sucks like an Electrolux. And a magazine for church furniture ran this ad:
Well, anyone can stumble, even me. Ian in Helsinki (an Aussie who moved to Finland, married, and speaks Finnish, one of the most difficult languages to learn) has a question about a rare episode of sex in Hornet’s Sting, my RFC novel set in 1917. He finds it difficult to understand “the significance of Dash’s affair with the nurses he cannot identify and what they represent or symbolise in the story.”
Let’s start with Lieutenant Charles Dash. He arrives
at Hornet Squadron in
One day the mobile cinema truck fails to arrive. Probably stuck in heavy snow. Dash sets off on horseback to find it, gets lost and ends up at a house where half a dozen English nurses live. They are enormously pleased to welcome a handsome young RFC pilot, give him supper and a bed where - in pitch-black darkness - one of them introduces him to the excitement of sex. No words are exchanged. For months afterwards he searches for the girl. In vain.
The significance of Dash’s affair (a small detail in the novel) is that it illustrates the innocence and ignorance of most men who joined the Royal Flying Corps, as well as providing an example of the haphazard nature of their life in a time of war. Many pilots were very young, sometimes only months away from school, and sex was a mystery. At the same time, they were flying high in a machine designed to kill, eager to destroy a Hun aeroplane yet well aware that they risked being shot down. Dash’s affair took this contrast to extremes. By day in the sky or by night with a nurse, chance was everything. War is luck.
Ian’s email reminded me that I had an unpublished memoir by Dr Martin Herford, who was Medical Officer for the British Volunteers who went to
Fast-forward from then to now. Email arrives
from all corners as well as
and seeing nothing in the dark.
There is a lot of World War One in World War Two. Nothing new in that idea, but it helps to explain a few hoary myths, such as the belief that machine guns were the most lethal weapon in the Great War. The late John Terraine was a tireless myth-buster (he did a good hatchet-job on the Angels of Mons) and he took a hard look at the casualty figures. What he found was that bullets caused less then 40 per cent of British casualties in WW1. What did most of the damage? Artillery. Shells and bombs accounted for nearly 60 per cent. Machine guns could kill men in the open, but for most of the time the infantry was in the trenches, safe from bullets. But not from artillery. A soldier who survived it said: “Sustained shell-fire was the most trying and terrifying thing to be feared by all.”
It was an artillery war. In the third German offensive of 1918, 6,000 guns fired two million shells in a little over four hours - and that was only part of the attack. The tragedy of that war was that all sides delivered ever-larger bombardments that caused massive carnage, and yet for most of the war it made little difference; until the last year, the Trenches survived. The generals, of course, were far beyond the gunners’ range, which meant that, once the battle began, they were out of control.
Hitler knew this, better than most. For almost the entire war he
was a messenger, what the British army calls a runner, in an infantry
battalion. He ran messages from the staff to the trenches and
vice versa: dangerous work. He took part in the
The second war began with quick success in
weighed so much that it could be moved only by rail. It had a
barrel of enormous length that could hurl a shell 26 miles high, which
put it in the stratosphere. Three minutes later it fell on
is well known to meteorologists and aerospace experts. If you
fling something high enough and far enough, it will eventually come
down - but meanwhile the planet keeps
rotating, and the missile will not land where you aimed it.
Bertha’s three minutes in the air meant that the shelling was never
accurate. The supergun was a terror weapon. Nevertheless,
after 1940 Hitler put a lot of time and effort into trying to shell
Hitler never learned the lessons of history. He invaded
believed that Russians, being Slavs, were inferior beings; they
would collapse in the face of his armies. (After only four
months he declared the war won: ‘The foe was broken and would
never rise again.’) He knew little about
This is not to diminish the stunning success of his Blitzkrieg. In 1940,
was a story of the wrong aircraft, poor equipment, and
frustrated aircrews. The first night fighters were
Blenheims, already obsolescent. There were a lot of
accidents - airfields had no homing
beacons, aircraft radios were feeble, blind-flying
instruments were unreliable. Night after night, the Blenheims
found no enemy bombers. “Our failure was due simply to our
inability to see another aircraft in the dark,” said an air
gunner. Eventually airborne radar sets appeared, and
they baffled everybody. They were subject to an infuriating
number of faults. When the Blitz began, the night skies were full
of enemy bombers; the Blenheims searched and always landed
empty-handed. Morale suffered. The hard fact was that
Desperate times call for desperate remedies, and some strange solutions were considered, including airborne searchlights, showers of magnesium flares, minefields dangling on parachutes. Some wanted anti-aircraft guns mounted on balloons. Others wanted aircraft to fly above raiders and drop sand in their engines. At one stage, Blenheim aircrew believed that they were losing radar contacts because enemy bombers escaped with incredible speed. Then it was found that their radar sets could show an enemy aircraft that was behind it as well as in front. If the pilot believed the bomber was in front, and he increased speed to catch it, the result was that he ran away from the target behind him. With that discovery, the mythical superfast bombers vanished,
Better radar sets appeared, and the excellent Beaufighter replaced the Blenheim. On 20 November 1940, John Cunningham made a radar contact and shot down a Junkers 88. This good news was flashed to Group HQ, to Fighter Command HQ, and to Air Ministry. It was very encouraging - but it was just one bomber at a time when hundreds were raiding
Readers Write #58 July 2018
the B-25 with nine guns,
and more cunning ack-ack schemes..
One of the pleasures of having readers in distant corners of
the globe is the unusual addresses they live in. For example:
This has nothing to do with ingratitude. Peter explained the origin. Go back to Saxon times and the word meant ‘rough or unclaimed common land, often settled illegally by squatters’. It happened elsewhere; villages named ‘Unthank’ crop up in the North of England. Then, in Victorian times, the estates running south-west from
Peter is one of many readers who discovered my books a generation ago (sometimes two generations), and he values them because they provided ‘enormous pleasure’ but also for ‘greater insight into the early years of the RAF’ - where his grandfather served in World War One, and after that in the Indian Air Force. Werner, in
When I first published Piece of Cake, my American publishers thoughtfully sent me a first sketch of their proposed cover design. It showed RAF fighter pilots in
The picture is from John Dill in
The detail is astonishing. B-25s skip-bombed Japanese ships; with no fins on the bombs and minimal fusing, this gave the aircraft just time to escape the blast. Enemy ack-ack guns tried to track the bombers; enlargements of the photograph show an individual Japanese gunner on the bow, pointing at the plane. A bomb from a second B-25 has hit the deck cargo and flung debris over the port side. In 1944 the B-25 was, for a twin-engined bomber, very heavily armed: this particular aircraft had no less than nine 50-calibre machine guns. As John says, ‘They often sank thin-skinned ships such as naval vessels by strafing alone.’
John collects military history and fiction; he’s read my books several times. ‘My favourites are the ‘Hornet Squadron’ series, which I’ve read to the point that they’ve fallen to pieces and I’ve had to replace them... With authors like you, I get the benefit of very hard work without doing the research myself.’ He ends with an invitation: ‘If you’re ever in the Florida Panhandle, there’s a draft Guinness waiting for you.’ He suspects that Stanley Woolley was a distant uncle.
In my last RW, I looked at Fighter Command’s failure to make
a dent in German nightly raids on
Since then I’ve learned that, in World War One, far more
wild and wonderful solutions reached the Inventions Department of the Ministry
of Munitions. Suggestions for dealing with hostile aircraft
included: freezing the clouds and mounting guns on them; covering
the moon with a big black balloon; arming aeroplanes with scythes, like
Boadicea’s chariots; and attaching a searchlight to an anti-aircraft gun
and firing along the beam. Other proposals were dismissed as absurd, but
in essence they looked forward to a different war The WW1 suggestion of
getting cormorants to fly to
Readers Write #59 September 2018
what really happened at Pearl Horbor,
and hello cock-up, goodbye conspiracy.
Statesmen are human. In photographs, they look infallible: calm, confident and wise. Yet they have failings, just like the rest of us, and war sometimes brings out the best and the worst in them. Stalin was vain. He was short and squat, only five feet three, and when he stood on a reviewing stand at parades, he made sure that his colleagues stood well behind him. If he had not been so self-centred, would he have refused to believe that German armies invaded Russia in 1941? It was a week before he admitted the truth. Churchill never liked the microphone and he made very few broadcasts. (Some were made by actors who mastered his style.) Roosevelt’s ‘fireside chats’ made the most of radio; to the American people he was a neighbourhood friend. Perhaps he was too friendly. At times a leader has to knock heads together, and a recent book gives hard evidence of Roosevelt’s reluctance to do so.
The book is The Secret World by a Cambridge historian, Professor Christopher Andrew. It’s a chunky volume of 948 pages, but very readable: Andrew explains the tangled world of military intelligence with remarkable clarity. It’s a big world - his index runs to 69 pages and his bibliography of the sources he’s used amounts to 57 pages. I zeroed in on his chapter about World War Two, and especially Pearl Harbor and the President.
On Sunday, 7th December 1941,the Japanese bombing of the U.S. Pacific fleet in harbour at Hawaii left America stunned, then infuriated, and finally puzzled. It was an even greater shock than 24/11. The attack on the Twin Towers happened at a time of terrorist atrocities, whereas Pearl Harbor was bombed after twenty-two years of peace. Americans asked themselves: How can this happen? Why was there no warning? Japan is 3,000 miles from Hawaii. Surely somebody must have known? The conspiracy theorists looked hard at Roosevelt. Did he allow Pearl Harbor to happen because he knew that war was inevitable and this was his way to bounce America into the fight?
There are two sides to SIGINT (Signals Intelligence). One is the ability to decode the enemy’s message; another is the ability of a nation’s leader to comprehend what is in the decrypt (the decoded message). Professor Andrew makes it clear that, in 1941, both were lacking in America. In September 1940, America broke the Japanese diplomatic code, known as PURPLE. A year later, on 26 and 28 November 1941, Tokyo sent coded signals to its foreign embassies that it intended to break diplomatic relations with the U.S., Britain and the Soviet Union, and on 1 and 2 December certain embassies were told to destroy all codebooks and secret papers. The decrypts, known as MAGIC, provided clear evidence that war was on its way. Hindsight says that the U.S.Navy should have been on the alert. It didn’t happen. The Japanese diplomatic code made no mention of naval action, and in 1941 the U.S.Navy’s codebreakers could not break the Japanese naval code. In the months leading up to Pearl Harbor, the U.S.Navy intercepted thousands of Japanese naval signals but they were all meaningless. The Navy gave a low priority to breaking that code. Usually only two cryptanalysts worked on it.
The President himself is ultimately responsible for the importance of military intelligence, and in 1941 the handling of SIGINT in the White House was in a state of confusion. The code and cipher sections of the Army and the Navy were bitter rivals, and in an attempt to keep the peace, someone came up with what Professor Andrew calls ‘an absurdly bureaucratic formula’. Both sections would work on intercepting PURPLE, but ‘the Army would receive all traffic on days with an even date and the Navy all traffic on days with an odd date’. What’s more, MAGIC was to be supplied to the President by his naval aide in even-numbered months and by his Army aide in odd months. Their rivalry damaged efficiency: in at least one month the Army refused to supply any decrypts to the President. Intelligence, it seems was not high on Roosevelt’s list of priorities. The evidence shows that there was no conspiracy about the ‘infamy’ of Pearl Harbor. What emerges is explained by the ‘cock-up theory’. It applies to a lot of military history.
Back to the present day. Years ago I knocked out a piece about how I write my kind of stuff. Since then, a few people have asked for advice, so here’s the nub of the piece:
Writing is hard work. Easy writing is hard reading. Never say a person is brave. Show him acting bravely. Let the reader do half the work. A lot of writing is thinking. Before I start, I re-read a few pages. This is the flywheel principle - it keeps the momentum going. Everything is in longhand, double-spaced to leave room for change. It’s easier to cut in longhand. When you re-read a page or two that you sweated over and you realise it’s junk, one slash of a pen deletes it. That’s satisfying. Get the details right or you will lose your reader’s confidence. In a book by Eric Ambler, someone with flu takes antibiotics. Since antibiotics do nothing for flu, the detail did nothing for the reader’s faith. Moral: check everything, trust nobody. Especially yourself.
Readers write, and they are not all male. Emma, somewhere in the UK, began with Goshawk Squadron and is steadily working her way through my stuff. ‘Military fiction isn’t normally my bag,’ she says, ‘but your style is black and funny.’ Her pick of the bunch is Damned Good Show, ‘mainly because of Silk, closely followed Kate as a favourite character’. Silk has no first name, and she wonders about that. It just happened, Emma. Silko was enough. He never seemed to need anything else. Simon in Surrey discovered Hullo Russia, Goodbye England: ‘Vintage Robinson,’ he says. Then he read Kramer’s War and enjoyed ‘the unexpected encounter with Rommel. Never thought I’d get to meet him.’ But ‘ultimately Piece of Cake can never be bettered’. Colin in Oxfordshire is ‘slowly, but very enjoyably, re-reading all your books - and keeping my wife awake as I am accused of shaking the bed with laughter every few minutes’. (Reminds me of the American fan who laughed so hard that he was at risk of cracking a rib.)
And requests for Holy Smoke arrive from far afield - from Jan in South Africa, David in Helsinki, and Marcel in The Netherlands, who has ‘spent many hours reading through the RFC and RAF novels and enjoyed everyone of them’. Emails are always welcome but Barry in Bath brightened up my breakfast with a picture postcard from Italy. He writes: ‘Decided to save Holy Smoke from last year to this - so that the Italian ambience would flavour the sauce. It worked a treat and the book was really enjoyable. As always with yours.’ The novel’s anti-hero is a con artist with a talent like Luis Cabrillo, and Barry reckons he ‘deserves to join the ranks of van Meegeren and Tom Keating et al, as one who fooled the experts, albeit but a brief flame’. The story is based on fact. Maybe Scattolini/del Pronto (every con artist has an alias) has a new lease of life.
Readers Write #60 November 2018
the Bloody Paralyser,
and two right hands.
Britain was lucky to have squadrons of Hurricanes and Spitfires when World War Two broke out. We were also lucky to have Roy Fedden, a brilliant engineer whose team at Bristol Aircraft Factory had designed Pegasus aircooled radial engines, smaller, lighter and more powerful than online aero engines. A Pegasus delivered over 900 horsepower - high performance in those days - and the Pegasus proved its reliability in the 1930s when it powered a single-engined Vickers Wellesley non-stop from Egypt to Australia, a world record of 7,162 miles. (Still a record for a single-engined aircraft.)
Fedden’s team had another triumph: mass production. By 1939 the Pegasus had a supercharger, automatic boost control, and provision for variable-pitch propeller, and well over half the RAF’s bombers had Pegasus engines. Roy Fedden may be a forgotten hero to many people, but not in Bristol. For the first two years of the war. most Bomber Command aircraft flew on Pegasus engines, and that included the first raid on Berlin. Flight Lieutenant Frank Lowe, DFM, flew a Hampden bomber to Berlin in 1940. I was lucky enough to meet him.
The Hampden was nicknamed the Flying Suitcase because it had a short, deep fuselage connected to the tail by a narrow boom. The crew of four had little room to move. It was a round trip of 1,150 miles to Berlin, which might take five hours, often more if they faced a head wind. They flew at night, which had its hazards apart from enemy flak and unpredictable weather; it was bitterly cold at 15,000 feet. Frank Lowe bombed Berlin (which came as a shock to Hermann Goering, who had promised the German people that their country was impregnable) and his two Pegasus engines brought him back. He liked the Hampden and admired the Pegasus. There is no substitute for meeting a man who has been at the sharp end of war, and my novel Damned Good Show was all the better for my having met Frank. I wrote the book because I felt Bomber Command had been shortchanged: few people realised that RAF bomber crews were in action from the very start: the first Hampden operation was on 3rd September 1939. Later I learned about the Bloody Paralyser.
Berlin had been the target a generation earlier. Before Bomber Command, there was the Independent Force of World War One. Hugh Trenchard, looking for ways of using the RFC to shorten the war, urged a bombing campaign that would damage Germany’s war production and weaken morale. Then twenty Gotha bombers raided London in July 1917, and that prompted a demand for reprisal. The result was the Independent Force, separate from the RFC, mainly equipped with the DH9 and the Vickers Vimy. Handley Page saw the need for a bigger aircraft, able to carry a heavier bombload further; and it designed a monster.
Their V/1500 bomber had a wingspan of 126 feet (the Lancaster’s was 102) and four Rolls-Royce Eagle VIII engines, each with 12 cylinders; they produced an astonishing 1500 horsepower; hence the name. The engines were mounted in tandem with propellers that were 12 feet long. The ‘pusher’ had a four-bladed prop, the ‘puller’ was two-bladed. The short-range bombload was 7,500 lbs, and the bomber had enough range to reach Berlin with 1,200 lbs of bombs. There was a crew of five and anything from 4 to 8 machine guns, including an innovation: a tail gunner. The RAF (as the RFC became in April 1918) liked the monster. They called it the ‘Bloody Paralyser’.
It came within a whisker of bombing Berlin. A V/1500 was about to take off when news of the Armistice grounded it. Nevertheless it saw action. A year later it took a week to fly to India, just in time for the 3rd Afghan War. The Amir, annoyed because he had not been invited to the Peace Conference at Versailles, was about to invade India. Nobody was looking forward to yet another bruising campaign in the mountains of the North-West Frontier, and somebody had the bright idea of using the V/1500. It worked. The sight of the Bloody Paralyser above Kabul - probably the first aircraft ever seen in Afghanistan - panicked the harem, who rushed into the street. The bomber made a few leisurely circuits and dropped some small bombs on the palace. It was enough. The Amir gave in. Peace rapidly followed, but India had the last word. Termites found the V/1500 and reduced it to scrap.
Back to the present. Authors would be nothing without readers, and I get messages (firstname.lastname@example.org) from all over. Bill in Chesapeake, Virginia, asked for Holy Smoke, Why 1914? and Operation Bamboozle, which should complete his collection, and said: “I can’t wait to read them, and anything else you write in the future.” Mike Ripley in Essex publishes a column on crime fiction called Getting Away With Murder. He enjoyed Holy Smoke and identified the picture on the back cover as Constantine’s Finger.
And I thought it was just a bit of ancient Roman rockery. Mike knew better: “The finger was part of the Colossus of Emperor Constantine the Great, thought to have been 40 feet high. Probably two right hands were made” - the one with the finger, and one holding a staff inscribed with a Christian symbol to indicate his conversion to the new religion. A Colossus doesn’t come cheap, and when they had to update it they did the Roman equivalent of photoshopping and chucked the old finger aside, which is where it is today. Statesmen like big statues. Somewhere in India they have a statue of an Independence leader, S.V.Patel, which is the tallest in the world at 600 feet high. Low-flying aircraft beware.
My thanks to all who wrote. Derek Robinson
an inscrutable cocktail,
and 'Didn't you used to be Somebody?'
The short story of the German air raids on Britain in WW2 is they didn’t succeed. As Alfred Price, a fine historian who has studied the raids, wrote: ‘The home front had stood firm; the Blitz on Britain had failed.’ That survival was won at some cost - from start to finish, the chances of a British citizen being killed in these raids was 1 in 800. In all, 52,000 people were killed and 63,000 seriously injured, plus another 8,500 killed and 23,000 injured in the V1 flying bomb and V2 rocket attacks.
What is easily forgotten is how close the German bombers came to threatening Britain’s ability to wage war. The Blitz of 1940-41 - not only on London; every big city took a pounding - was virtually a free-for-all for the Luftwaffe. When it sent its bombers by night, the air defence of Britain was negligible. Night fighters, guns and balloons destroyed only a tiny proportion of the bombers. Often, the bombers made two trips on the same night, navigating by the fires they had started in the first raid.
One of the great ‘What Ifs?’ of WW2 must be the question: if Germany had not attacked Russia, and if the Blitz had continued throughout 1941 (in those days, Britain had little to stop it), would Britain have been able to continue the war? Bear in mind that in 1941 many Americans were reluctant to get involved in Europe. So there were two great strokes of luck for the Allies. First, Hitler attacked Russia and gave Britain a breathing-space. Second, Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and a few days later Hitler declared war on the USA. At the time, these were regarded by the West as disasters. In hindsight, we can see that they were blessings The carnage at Pearl Harbor and the huge sufferings of the Soviet Union were the price the Allies paid for what proved to be massive blunders by Japan and Germany. When Pearl Harbor and Hitler gave the US no choice but to fight, Churchill noted with relief that we could not lose the war. And it’s worth remembering that, until the end, no less than two-thirds of all German troops were fighting on the eastern front, a fact that puts the European victory in some perspective.
Here, just to illustrate the difficulties of defending Britain against the Blitz, is an obsolete Harrow bomber.
It released the Long Aerial Mine, part of a desperate attempt to stop the raiders. The aim was for the Harrow to release 140 parachute mines in a curtain that it was hoped the bombers would fly into. The Harrow’s top speed was 170 mph; it took 40 minutes to reach 20,000 feet; so it was asking a lot of it to arrive in advance of a raid. The aerial minefield was soon scrapped.
From ‘What If?’ to the Ultimate Cocktail. Hornet’s Sting, my 1917 RFC story, is named after Hornet squadron’s ability to shoot down the enemy plus the CO’s formula for a celebratory drink. This was calculated to make the eyeballs rotate and lightning to streak between the ears. He called the mixture ‘Hornet’s Sting’ and it called for a tin bath and every bottle within reach. (The recipe is on page 136 of the paperback.) Garth in New York, an old pal and a great fan of my stuff, throws a New Year’s Eve party each year and welcomes his guests with his own brew of Hornet’s Sting. So here it is.
Garth says it looks black but in the glass it’s more dark green, which is because he added green chartreuse or possibly creme de menthe. Not that it matters. He re-read the novel and says: ‘It was great seeing the characters from War Story again, particularly Paxton, whose long, grim odyssey behind enemy lines was one for the ages.’ (Hornet’s Sting also launched the careers of Lacey and Brazier, who went on to greater things in other books.)
From New York to Victoria, Australia, where Tim first discovered my yarns by stealing a copy of Piece of Cake from the school library and who now has kids of his own, nearing reading age. For them, he’s building a library, including much of my stuff. (His favourite is still Cake.)
Another enthusiast is Alan in London: a massive fan who ‘can wax lyrical about Piece of Cake forever’. Nick, who could be anywhere, sends me Christmas greetings and says: ‘I can find no better antidote to the trials of life than immersing myself in one of your books.’ Guy, probably in the UK, has read all my aviation titles, ‘culminating in Hullo Russia, Goodbye England’ and he ‘enjoyed the historical accuracy and superb characters...a true pleasure to read.’ Ken, who ordered Holy Smoke, has harvested copies of just about everything I wrote by tracking down old library copies from as far afield as America. That’s real determination. Andy, in the UK, put down his copy of A Good Clean Fight (already re-read several times) to thank me for hours of pleasure over the years. Lastly, Jerry (perhaps in Texas) finished Damned Good Show and wrote: ‘Superb book. I enjoyed it cover to cover.’
Endpiece. When I was a boy, novelists were always photographed sitting in an armchair with a pipe and a spaniel at their feet. They were the guardians of literature. Nearly all are now out of print. Most novels are of their time; times change, and bestsellers fall by the wayside. Will my stuff still be read fifty years from now? Nobody knows. (Maybe nobody will be reading novels in 2069.) So I’d like to recommend a book titled The Book of Forgotten Authors by Christopher Fowler, featuring the many writers who were big in their day and are now hard to obtain.
Fowler, himself a prolific author, has tracked down 99 Forgotten Authors, from Margery Allingham to Edgar Wallace, and has written brief and breezy accounts of their lives. I especially enjoyed his piece on Kathleen Winsor, an American who at the age of 24 wrote Forever Amber, a bodice-ripping romp through Restoration London that weighed in at 1,000 pages and was the best-selling novel of the 1940s, despite (or perhaps because of) being banned by several US states. She was the sixth wife of bandleader Artie Shaw, after Lana Turner and Ava Gardner. It didn’t last, so she married her own divorce attorney, wrote other books that made no mark, and lived to be 84. Just one of the gems from Fowler’s very readable book. If he ever compiles a sequel, maybe I’ll be in it.
Readers Write #62 March 2019
Hot Spit! in Delaware,
and the birth of XX
After fifty years at the coalface, I have a fan club in England. The combined membership doesn’t reach three figures, so they aren’t likely to storm the BBC, Amazon and Netflix and demand that A Good Clean Fight, for example, be televised. This is reassuring, not because AGCF would not make a very watchable 10-episode drama but because my fans are a discerning and astute bunch who know what they like. Rob Hughes, who manages the club, tells me it is ‘running along quite nicely with 79 members who regularly convey their love of your books. They come from all over the world and from all walks of life, from a Canadian film scriptwriter and an American film producer to a humble gardener and car valeter,’ the last being Rob himself. He welcomes ‘anyone who likes to read about the unheroic and darkly absurd nature of air fighting in WW1 and WW2’, for which he recommends my stuff. The club is on Facebook at:
Here is the proof:
The aircraft is an FE2b, a pusher-prop machine of 1916 which gave the gunner (Paxton), a clear view ahead, although he had to stand in order to fire over the tail, which required the pilot (O’Neill) to fly straight or level, not something he enjoyed, thus leading to arguments. The novel is called War Story.
Back to the fan club and to anyone who is on Facebook. I am not, and I have no wish to be on Facebook. Please stop sending me your photographs and gossip. They are beyond my reach and they get promptly deleted. I suspect that this Facebook plague is a side-effect of the fan club. Members see my email address on my website and they add me to their Friends list. This is a large mistake. Please UnFriend me now. Leave me in peace and I will have no reason to track you down with a blunt putty-knife.
To happier news. Aimee, in the State of Delaware, finished reading my flipside ofGone With The Wind which was published as Kentucky Blues. ‘I had a ball!’ she writes. ‘I kept reading passages out loud to my brother, who has a similarly warped sense of humor as me. Great story, lots of plot twists, colorful characters, and plenty of nasty-funny dialogue and actions.’ She adds: ‘Of course, if you didn’t intend for the book to be so funny so often, then I guess I’m in pretty deep trouble about now. Or, as they said in Rock Springs, “Hot Spit.” ‘
Hot Spit! was the fashionable exclamation in backwoods Kentucky in 1856. The novel is longish (630 pages in paperback), so I lubricated it with plenty of laughs. There is a murder trial in KB that is deadly serious to the folks of Rock Springs, a remote township where they had to make their own entertainment. Everything goes wrong, which is always a formula for black humour.
There’s a happy ending to Aimee’s message. She told me about an American outfit, www.bookshare.org which converts books into accessible, downloadable formats including Braille, for blind or print-disabled people. Bookshare has a library of 600,000 titles, free of royalty, including all my books. (‘You never know what you’ll turn up when you browse Bookshare, to a big reader it’s like a kid in a candy story,’ Aimee says.) The cost is nominal. So: good for Aimee - but, strangely, my publishers have not made my books available to a similar facility in the UK. If my books are available to sight-disabled people in the US, why not in the UK? I jogged my publishers’ elbows, and heard that they are in discussion with the Royal National Institute for Blind People. I hope they can see their way clear.
My luck, of course, is to write in English, which helps my stuff find its way around the world. English is an amazingly flexible, meaningful language, and I came across a couple of examples of its history. Today we use the phrase ‘by hook and by crook’ to mean ‘any old how’. Seven centuries ago it meant the right to pull branches from standing trees for fuel - an important privilege when fire meant warmth. The other phrase is ‘double cross’, which turns out to have its origin 200 years ago in the world of prize-fighting in England. Pugilism was illegal, and prize-fights happened in remote places where huge crowds gathered to watch. It was bare-knuckle stuff, and much betting took place, so inevitably some matches were fixed. If one of the fighters had agreed to lose, this was called a ‘cross fight’ and the records carried an X. If a fighter agreed to lose but didn’t, this was a ‘double cross’ and the records showed XX. Thus it entered the language.
Double Cross System in World War Two was a counter-espionage
agency. It controlled the ranks of double agents in Britain,
believed by Germany to be sending valuable intelligence but in fact
they transmitted a stream of deception to fool the enemy. I told
the story in The Eldorado Network and its sequel Artillery of Lies,
and now John in Colorado finds them helpful. ‘In addition to lines that
cause me to laugh out loud, you have a way of giving me useful lines. In Artillery of Lies,
when Julie, miffed at Luis, is asked by Freddy, ‘Is there
anything I can do?’, her reply is to the point.’ I looked it
up. Here’s it is. ‘Sure,’ she called over her shoulder.
‘Kick the living shit out of him. Should keep you busy for the
rest of the week.’ Which puts John in mind of his response
to leading politicians. He also hopes I have more books in the
pipeline. A new novel is in the expert hands of the typist. Watch
Readers Write #63 May 2019
and picking plums in Norway
We live in an age of conspiracy theories. Much of it is a knock-on effect of social media. Anyone, anywhere in the world, can shoot his (or her) mouth off, accuse anybody of anything, and there are enough lame brains around to agree. (A recent mini-conspiracy in the U.S. accused a restaurant of keeping children in tunnels under its basement. The restaurant has no basement, and the armed conspirator who attempted to release the non-existent children in now in jail; but that hasn’t stopped the restaurant owner getting death threats. And I recall the passion that raged for two years in an English village over an alleged plan to turn a meadow into a school playing field, until someone phoned the county council who told him that there was no such plan. Much indignation had been wasted.Some people like a fight. And there is the human reaction to a major disaster: there must be a major reason. Nothing has provoked more conspiracy theories than the assassination of President Kennedy. More than two thousand books have been written about it, and nearly 30 gunmen have been named as the second (or third, fourth or fifth) shooter at the site in Dallas. Most books have attacked the Warren Commission’s conclusion that a lone assassin killed JFK, and was then killed by another lone gunman. No doubt the conspiracy theorists will persist, if only because - as Bill Alexander, the assistant D.A. who drew up the indictment against Lee Harvey Oswald, has said -
‘You have to understand, what you are dealing with is a thriving industry. People are making lucrative livings off of selling conspiracy theories to the public. What happens to the truth? Hell, it got lost under a lot of dollar signs.’Well, not entirely lost. I recommend Case Closed, a book by a former Wall Street lawyer, Gerald Posner. It’s not a light read. In paperback it runs to 608 pages, including the Notes, Acknowledgments and Bibliography, but his investigation is gripping because he analyses every conspiracy theory about the Kennedy assassination, exposes their fallacies, and demonstrates, calmly and clearly, why they are wrong. He gives a detailed account of Lee Harvey Oswald’s confused life and why he was the sole gunman. (Oswald served in the Marine Corps and qualified as a ‘sharpshooter’, using a standard M-1 rifle; in Dallas he owned a rifle with a 4-power telescopic sight; later the FBI tested it and rated it ‘a very accurate weapon’.) Posner describes Jack Ruby’s seedy lifestyle and proves beyond doubt that Ruby chanced to be nearby when Oswald was being transferred from jail, which gave Ruby the opportunity to shoot him. The truth about the Kennedy assassination is that Oswald and Ruby were vain, stupid and lucky. A major disaster was caused by two small-minded men. That will not satisfy conspiracy theorists because they cannot read a 608-page book; but it convinced me. Try it. And now for something completely different.
These three Curtiss Kittyhawks, lined up in Tunisia in WW2, display their shark’s teeth; you can even see the red tongues inside them. In A Good Clean Fight, Kittyhawks (or Tomahawks: much the same) are useful ground-attack aircraft, rugged enough to take punishment. At height, not so hot. Built like a brick and flew like one. Fighter pilots often marvelled at bomber pilots who spent long hours in the cockpit; which may have prompted an email from John, somewhere in the UK, who is writing a book based on 50 letters from his father in Stalag Luft 3. Before that, he flew Hampdens on 83 Squadron in 1940-41, and ‘had a very close shave with stabilised yaw... while turning at low level, he lost control and crashed, hitting a tree. The crew got out relatively unscathed. I knew nothing about stabilised yaw before reading your book.’ That’s Damned Good Show. Flying Hampdens - a twin-engined bomber - had its hazards apart from flak and fighters, and one was yaw. It was a design fault: if you banked the aircraft too much, the wing and fuselage might block the airflow to the tail unit. Lacking air to bite on, the twin rudder and elevators would be useless and the Hampden might well topple sideways, sometimes with fatal results. John’s father was lucky: a week after he hit a tree, he crashed on take-off and hit a Nissen hut, again without injuries. He completed a tour of operations, won the DFM, and began a second tour, flying Lancasters. He ran out of luck over Augsburg in 1942, got hit, caught fire, crash-landed and spent the rest of the war in Stalag Luft 3 - which, John reckons, ‘almost saved his life’. The odds were against finishing a first tour, let alone a second. He was awarded a well-deserved DFC.
thanks to all who wrote.
Readers Write #64 June 2019
Here is a test. Below is part of the reports made by two radar stations concerning a raid by bombers on 7th October 1943. The test is: What town was being attacked? And what made radar control of night fighters ‘practically impossible’? The reports said:
(1) “...the number of echoes increased rapidly and by 2025 hours a considerable area of tube blanked out. Accurate control of fighter aircraft became practically impossible, IFF (indications) could not be seen, and the height/range tubes were swamped. It was not observed for some time that the mass of echoes was stationary...”
(2) “At approximately 2043 hours the raid had increased to about 200 echoes (i.e. indications of aircraft) and split into two main parts, a northerly and a southerly mass with a gap of six miles between them. Fighter aircraft were difficult to control because their IFF was not visible through the interference on the cathode-ray tube.”
Anyone who knows anything about European bombing offensives in WW2 will have said: ‘Window.’ By 1943, German ground-controlled night fighters were shooting down so many R.A.F. bombers that an antidote was urgently sought - some means of neutralising the enemy radar system. The answer was strips of aluminium foil, measuring 12 inches by 1½ inches, packed in bundles of 2,000 and dropped by each aircraft at the rate of one bundle a minute. By doing this, a bomber stream could saturate radar antennas with blips, stifle their controlling function, and leave the night fighters without direction. The British codename for the foils was Window; Americans called it Chaff. Normally, the echoes of aircraft moved on the radar tubes. Window appeared as a cloud of interference, which is why one radar station was puzzled when ‘the mass of echoes was stationary’.
Another clue is IFF, which stood for ‘Identification - Friend or Foe’ (codenamed ‘Pipsqueak’). It was a device transmitted by Allied aircraft so that radar stations could identify them. If Window made fighters’ IFF unreadable, then the bombers must be German. That leaves the target, and the answer is Norwich, in the east of England. Window was not exclusive to R.A.F. Bomber Command. The Luftwaffe used it too. They called it ‘Dueppel’, and on the 7th October 1943 it was very effective. R.AF. night-fighter crews found themselves chasing shadows. Of 35 German bombers attacking Norwich, only one was destroyed - when it had left the Dueppel cloud and was on its way home, over the North Sea.
Germany woke up late to the potential of radar. The Battle of Britain was a shock. (Ulrich Steinhilper, a fighter pilot. complained that ‘just like passengers waiting for a scheduled service, the Spitfires would be on station waiting for the next wave’. Radar was a mystery to him.) In 1942, German scientists found the same solution as British scientists: metal strips. Both sides now had a secret that could disarm radar stations and liberate the bombers from night fighters. Both sides were reluctant to use it, for fear of giving away the secret and then being made to suffer from it.
By 24th July 1943, Bomber Command first used Window in its highly successful raid on Hamburg. Inevitably, the Luftwaffe would respond, and three months later it used Dueppel when it bombed Norwich. (Window/Dueppel were part of bombing strategy for the rest of the war, although advances in radar technology made it less effective.) The difference was that the Luftwaffe sent 35 bombers to Norwich, while Bomber Command sent 791 bombers to Hamburg. Perhaps the cloud of foil strips confused the German aircrews: none of their bombs hit the city. Their inexperience was a more likely cause; by 1943, Luftwaffe training was rushed. In the blitzkrieg years, Hitler had praised the Luftwaffe as the spearhead of his conquests. By 1943 it was understrength, struggling, and out of favour.
The Germans hoped for ‘secret weapons’ that would transform the war. They developed the JU86R, a bomber that could cruise at well above 40,000 feet, higher than any fighter could fly. At that height, and armed with only one bomb, it was incapable of hitting any target smaller than a town. Its campaign was brief. They developed a radio-controlled gliding bomb , which sank an Italian battleship in the Mediterranean; the Allies quickly learned to jam its radio beams. The plans for a German four-engined bomber, the HE177, looked good, but it had endless technical problems. (The engines tended to catch fire.) It never became operational.
Such research was not helped by Hitler’s anti-Semitic policies. Before 1939, many Jewish scientists escaped to Britain and contributed to the war effort. Hitler made light of their exodus; he remarked, ‘If science cannot do without Jews, then we will have to do without science.’ This was his attempt at wit, but his formula was not a winner.
As it was, Germany startled the Allies when it launched the V1 and V2 weapons against England, and when the world’s first jet fighter, the ME262, outflew the escorts for Allied bomber fleets over Germany. If those new weapons had appeared a year or two earlier, the war might have taken a different course. They were all too little and too late. And, whatever the innovations, any man is gambling recklessly when he declares war on Britain (and its Commonwealth), on Soviet Russia, and on the United States of America. Hitler attempted to win a short war. When that failed, he had no Plan B except the destruction of Germany. He said his people deserved it. They had let him down.
I have been reading Erich Maria Remarque’s 1929 novel, All Quiet on the Western Front, a book that was - in the author’s words - ‘an attempt to give an account of a generation that was destroyed by the war - even those of it who survived the shelling’. When the Nazis came to power they cancelled his citizenship and burned his book, saying it betrayed the German soldier in the Trenches. Remarque was lucky (conscripted in 1916 and having served in the Battle of Passchendaele, he deserved some luck) and Marlene Dietrich got him a visa to the United States. In 1939 he sailed on the last transatlantic voyage of the Queen Mary, went to Hollywood, kept writing, married the film actress Paulette Goddard, and lived to the age of 72. A remarkable life. Not many 1929 novels survive in print.
But is it a novel? Some have said it’s more of a historical document, since Remarque certainly used his own experiences in the German trenches; indeed, it’s impossible to write a book like his without having been there and seen the effect of shellfire, gas and dum-dum bullets. But every author draws on what he knows. Evelyn Waugh’s Officers and Gentlemen includes a convincing account of the British retreat from Crete in the summer of 1941 - convincing because Waugh was there. If Paul Scott had not been in India, he couldn’t have written the Raj Quartet and Staying on.
Recently I heard an interview with Thomas Keneally, who won the Booker Prize for his novel Schindler’s Ark (filmed as Schindler’s List). At the time, questions were asked about whether or not the book was truly a novel. Keneally has said that he made a decision to write it as fiction (the story is factually true) simply because he wanted a large audience to know about Schindler, and a novel would get far more readers than, say, a non-fiction Holocaust book. He was right. I have been described as writing documentary history disguised as fiction, and I can see the reason for this - my stuff is well researched and it’s reliable history. I’ve told the story; now it’s up to the reader. Either the novel works or it doesn’t. ‘Writers should write,’ Andrew O’Hagan has said, ‘and let other people argue about whether they like what they’ve written or not.’
Finally, as reward for
getting this far, here is another New Yorker literary cartoon.
Bestsellers get publicity; nobody mentions the books that fail. Yet
every author has one. This is by Roz Chast, a cartoonist who regularly
finds humour in failure.
My thanks to all who wrote.
Readers Write #65 August 2019
the secret of Pegasus,and the curse of the mumbling actor.
This is what the more honest reporters have added to their lengthy analyses of Brexit; they have ended by admitting that:
I offer this on behalf of all those who have wasted valuable years of their lives in reading or hearing the guesswork about Brexit that adds up to:
Perhaps the best comment was by The New Yorker writer A.J.Liebling. In 1953 he wrote about what Americans call flapdoodle over reports that Stalin had suffered a stroke and might be dead:
“I had an ungenerous feeling, while paddling through all this
identical speculation, that I was watching a small boy pull a cud of
chewing gum out to the longest possible string until it broke."
The fact was that, instead of saying that nobody knows, the new media produced flapdoodle. Not much has changed since 1953.
Down through the years, the Parachute Regiment has had a good Press. I wonder why it still exists. Today the Paras are regarded as an elite force in the British Army, yet it is hard to think of a modern military situation where paratroops would be used.
In the Second World War, they raised as many questions as answers. At first they were seen as an irresistible weapon of war: in 1940, Churchill warned his military adviser that ‘parachutists may sweep over and take Liverpool or Ireland...’ Much was claimed for the success of of German airborne forces in their 1940 capture of the Belgian fortress of Eban Emael. It is true that German gliders landed on the roof, but in fact the Belgian garrison fought hard for a day and a night, and the fort did not fall until paratroops were relieved by infantry.
In 1941, the capture of the island of Crete was regarded as an airborne success; simple arithmetic proved otherwise. 22,000 airborne troops attacked Crete and 6,650 were killed, wounded or missing. The Luftwaffe lost 220 aircraft; half of those were troop-carrying Ju52s. Hitler never again risked a major airborne operation. The hard fact was that paratroops were vulnerable and lightly armed. Lowflying gliders might be shot down; parachutists were a simple target as they floated down. As with Eban Emael, it was German infantry who secured Crete.
Crete was attacked by day. In 1943, the Allies decided to invade Sicily by night - darkness would assist the invader. It also cost a large part of the British and American airborne force that was meant to be the spearhead of the invasion. Glider pilots were inexperienced and under-trained. It was 270 miles from Tunisia to Sicily. A dying gale made navigation difficult. Glider-and-tug combinations lost formation. Too often, the intercom link between plane and glider failed. Many tow planes released their gliders too far from the shore. Of 137 gliders, only 54 landed in Sicily; the rest were in the sea. 605 officers and men were casualties, of which 326 were missing, probably drowned. Their target had been the Ponte Grand bridge; only five per cent of airborne troops reached the bridge and saw action. In the end, seaborne infantry captured Sicily.
Lessons were learned. In 1944, the airborne force in the D-Day landings suffered heavy losses but they achieved most of their aims, the most famous of which was the capture of two strategic bridges known as the Pegasus Bridges, said to be a Paras’ triumph. In fact, those bridges were captured by glider-borne men of the Oxford and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry; 7th Para, who were dropped nearby, relieved them after two hours. Landing the Ox and Bucks gliders within a stone’s throw of the bridges has been called the ‘airmanship feat of the war’. What most accounts overlook is the contribution of Thomas Somerville.
He was 28, a science graduate working at the Royal Aeronautical Establishment in Farnborough, and he was on his honeymoon in Wales when he was urgently recalled. Sicily had been a grim shock to airborne forces. One answer was to give glider pilots far more training, especially at night. Another was an improvement that Somerville devised, tested and proved.
Landing Allied gliders at night, especially when loaded with troops plus jeeps or heavy arms, was hazardous. They needed plenty of open space, as much as 150 yards before they came to a halt. Before that happened, they might hit trees, walls, barns, streams, perhaps other crashed gliders. The fields near the Pegasus bridges were small and cramped. Somerville designed two 14-feet parachutes that fitted under the glider’s tail; just before touchdown the parachutes were released and cut short its landing run. He tested the equipment, flying as an observer in a Horsa glider; the idea worked. On D-Day, six Horsas, carrying the Ox and Bucks infantry, landed at night, and thanks to the skill of the glider pilots and Somerville’s arrester parachutes, their touchdown was close to the bridges and very short. The capture of the bridges was vital; it prevented German armoured units from threatening the D-Day landings.
Today, arrester parachutes (now known as Brake Shutes) are standard equipment for many high-speed fighters. Here’s the RAF Eurofighter Typhoon showing how it’s done.
Somerville didn’t get a medal - he was a civilian - but he had a distinguished career and was appointed CBE. He, as much as anyone, made possible the success at the Pegasus Bridges.
The BBC has announced that it plans to introduce a device that helps TV viewers who can’t make sense of their dramas because the actors mumble, whisper, or get swamped by background music. This gives me an excuse to offer one of the best putdowns in showbiz by Ethel Merman, a lady whose words were always clearly heard. She was briefly married to Ernest Borgnine, although they disliked each other. When she was in her fifties, Merman went for an audition. She came back and remarked that she had been told she had the voice and face of a woman in her thirties. “What about your 60-year-old ass?” Borgnine growled. “Oh, you weren’t mentioned, darling,” she said.
Finally, yet another literary cartoon from the great years of The New Yorker, with thanks to Mike in Indianopolis who emailed me to say that he ‘gets more out of your web page than a month of the New York Times Review of Books’, which is encouraging. This cartoon is for all fans of Stephen King who have strong wrists. It came from the talented pen of Tom Hachtman.
My thanks to all who wrote.